Teams

Wallace 3.0 Summer DAZE Wed PM

2025 Summer Daze Doubles · 3.0 Wed PM Summer Daze

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
W#3 Female DoublesLaura Wallace / Erin Wallace vs Donna Keel / Gayle Taylordean6-4, 6-4
W#2 Female DoublesLaura Wallace / Melanie Burns vs Jennifer Klein / Kathryn Roberts2-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-07-02vs Milani 3.0 Summer DAZE Wed PMLost 01
L#2 Female DoublesLaura Wallace / Erin Wallace vs Catherine Johnstone / Tammy Milani2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#1 Female DoublesLaura Wallace / Erin Wallace vs Karen Hardesty / Amber Siesling2-6, 5-7
2025-06-11vs Hill 3.0 Summer DAZE Wed PMWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesLaura Wallace / Erin Wallace vs Ashley Bethel / Luisa Cobos6-1, 6-1
W#2 Female DoublesLaura Wallace / Erin Wallace vs Paige Turner / Philia Leach6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2025-05-21vs Tucker 3.0 Summer DAZE Wed PMWon 10
W#2 Female DoublesLaura Wallace / Erin Wallace vs Mary Mullens / Carrie Hanger6-2, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Wed PM Summer Daze have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Caroline Stowers
published 3.5
2.95
Melanie Burns
published
2.91
Laura Wallace
usually #2 Female Doubles 44%, also #3 Female Doubles 33% · published
2.85
Amy Kemp
published 3
2.84
Annetta Bartle
published 3
2.84
Michelle Swinyer
published
2.77
Gail Terrell
published
Devon Oliver
published 3
2.71
Kathleen Mattacola
published
2.38
Susan Oliver
published
Alison Barakat
published 2.5
Erin Wallace
published
Whitley Kemp
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Wallace + Michelle Swinyer033 matchesnot enough data
Caroline Stowers + Annetta Bartle123 matchesnot enough data
Annetta Bartle + Gail Terrell213 matchesnot enough data
Michelle Swinyer + Amy Kemp303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Caroline Stowers
23W–17L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Melanie Burns
27W–28L career · no lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
2.95
Laura Wallace
47W–73L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%73%26%
2.91
3
Amy Kemp
12W–10L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%14%
2.85
3
Annetta Bartle
15W–17L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
2.84
Michelle Swinyer
15W–11L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
2.84
Gail Terrell
18W–12L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Devon Oliver
4W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kathleen Mattacola
11W–12L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.71
Susan Oliver
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
80%20%<1%
2.38
2.5
Alison Barakat
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Erin Wallace
8W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Whitley Kemp
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.