Teams

FIT: 5.5 Combo:Brant/Meskin

2025 SCT Adult 18 & Over COMBO (Women) summer · 5.5 Women

15 players · average NTRP 2.70 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#1 DoublesEunice Lee / Debra Miller vs Nancy Day / Noreen Wenig3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJill Brant / Danielle Meskin vs Annmarie Maguire / Judy Dalaker6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMarisa Pilipshen / Julia Snowden vs Loralie Held / Suzanne Bartek6-2, 6-1
2025-07-17vs WRC: Combo 5.5: DebnathLost 12
L#1 DoublesAnne-Marie Grey / Michele Markelon vs Shannon Wten / Lori Barshop0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesDanielle Meskin / Kathy Knapp vs Orly Angerthal / Pallavi Debnath6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMeg Maise / ERIN BELLES vs Deirdre Fletcher / Inga Tuluca1-6, 4-6
2025-06-19vs WRC: Combo 5.5: DebnathLost 03
L#1 DoublesClare Epstein / Jen Landolt vs Emi Mills / Pallavi Debnath0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDanielle Meskin / Meg Maise vs Katie Ferguson / Leigh Hartnagel0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesERIN BELLES / Michele Markelon vs Jaime Booth / Anna Hertzman0-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesErica Winkler / Kathy Knapp vs Christina Spizzirri / Laura Hotchkiss2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJill Brant / Debra Miller vs Deborah Nicolson / Tami Siriwardene3-6, 7-6
L#3 DoublesAnne-Marie Grey / Julia Snowden vs Annmarie Maguire / Judy Dalaker3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-05-17vs WRC: Combo 5.5: DebnathSplit 11
L#1 DoublesEunice Lee / Meg Maise vs Emi Mills / Leigh Hartnagel3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJill Brant / Debra Miller vs Anna Hertzman / Laura Connell6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKathy Knapp / Marisa Pilipshen vs Christina Spizzirri / Laura Hotchkiss1-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMichele Markelon / Clare Epstein vs Nancy Day / Tara Donnelly4-6, 3-6
2025-04-05vs WRC: Combo 5.5: DebnathLost 12
L#1 DoublesErica Winkler / Kathy Knapp vs Emi Mills / Meagan Brody2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesDanielle Meskin / Debra Miller vs Katie Ferguson / Pallavi Debnath6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesCharlotte Dyslin / Clare Epstein vs Deirdre Fletcher / Laura Connell3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#1 DoublesJill Brant / Danielle Meskin vs Melissa Salvatore / Laura Hotchkiss3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMarisa Pilipshen / Anne-Marie Grey vs Lisa Ludwiczak / Kimberly Grosso1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.24 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Debra Miller
published 3
2.54
Erica Winkler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.44
Kathy Knapp
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.41
Julia Snowden
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.32
Danielle Meskin
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.31
Jill Brant
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.27
Marisa Pilipshen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Anne-Marie Grey
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Charlotte Dyslin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.13
Jen Landolt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.06
Clare Epstein
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.01
Michele Markelon
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
1.88
Meg Maise
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
ERIN BELLES
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Eunice Lee
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Danielle Meskin + Jill Brant111049% games+6.5% vs expected
Michele Markelon + Jen Landolt5257% games+4.7% vs expected
Jill Brant + Debra Miller2347% games−0.6% vs expected
Anne-Marie Grey + Charlotte Dyslin2446% games−2.0% vs expected
Anne-Marie Grey + Michele Markelon3740% games−5.6% vs expected
Charlotte Dyslin + Michele Markelon4942% games−8.5% vs expected
Jill Brant + Erica Winkler1446% gamesnot enough data
Anne-Marie Grey + Jill Brant044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Debra Miller
12W–19L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Erica Winkler
21W–31L career · 2 lines in 2025
38%61%<1%
2.54
Kathy Knapp
12W–24L career · 4 lines in 2025
68%32%<1%
2.44
Julia Snowden
8W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%73%27%
2.41
3
Danielle Meskin
25W–46L career · type A · 5 lines in 2025
90%10%<1%
2.32
Jill Brant
33W–48L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%92%8%
2.31
Marisa Pilipshen
18W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%95%5%
2.27
2.5
Anne-Marie Grey
14W–33L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Charlotte Dyslin
21W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jen Landolt
18W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.13
2.5
Clare Epstein
5W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.06
Michele Markelon
19W–36L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.01
Meg Maise
3W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.88
ERIN BELLES
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Eunice Lee
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.