Teams

WI Adult 18&O 3.0W GML Brookfield Elite Messling

2025 WI Adult 18 & Over · WI Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Women

16 players · average NTRP 3.08 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#2 DoublesChenoa James / Amy Germershausen vs Christina Rush / Lauren Morrow2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMICHELLE MESSLING / Rebecca Chiang vs Joyce Casey / Rosemary Morby0-6, 0-6
W#1 DoublesJackie Messler Barber / Renee LeSage vs Monica Thomas / Kate McKenzie7-5, 6-2
L#1 SinglesAlissa Braatz vs Stacy Blattner2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesCasey Aghjian / Chenoa James vs Erin Dummert / Karen Moran2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRebecca Chiang / Kim Miklas vs Eileen Booth / Suzanne Laurila6-2, 6-4
L#1 DoublesAllison Bardole / Deborah Pape vs Andrea Wroblewski / Jennifer Mcdonald5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesChristine Rudek / Tina Maloney vs Caitlin Forciea / Melissa Bashaw4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAmy Germershausen / Rebecca Chiang vs Jane Stephens / Julie Hartley3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesChenoa James / Tina Maloney vs Julie Klein / Elisabeth Partyka6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesRebecca Chiang / Christine Rudek vs Savannah Ferkins / Kim Spear6-1, 7-5
W#1 DoublesAllison Bardole / Deborah Pape vs Dianna Welch / Claudia Beaudoin6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesNisha Chandrasekharan vs Amber Schroeder2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCara Buchanan / Chenoa James vs Julia Haas / Bethany Bradd6-3, 6-2
W#2 SinglesAlissa Braatz vs Olga Kaslow6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesCasey Aghjian / Kim Miklas vs Greeta Hofbauer / Maye Berroya6-1, 6-0
L#1 DoublesRenee LeSage / Jackie Messler Barber vs Meg Roman / Amanda Curtis4-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesAlissa Braatz vs Caina Weiner4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesChristine Rudek / Tina Maloney vs Shirley Yagoda / Judith Bednar2-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesNisha Chandrasekharan vs Cat Long6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAmy Germershausen / MICHELLE MESSLING vs Mercedes Paz / Anna Huck6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · WI Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WI Adult 18&O 3.0W GML Princeton Club Washburn6023717197
2WI Adult 18&O 3.0W GML Lake Country WAC Roman51181225215
3WI Adult 18&O 3.0W GML North Shore CC Keane33191129254
4WI Adult 18&O 3.0W GML Brookfield Elite Messling33131735264
5WI Adult 18&O 3.0W GML FLAC Greving23121330225
6WI Adult 18&O 3.0W GML Village Club Blattner15121840292
7WI Adult 18&O 3.0W GML Brookfield Elite Hofbauer0532246294

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.25
Jackie Messler Barber
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Cara Buchanan
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.04
Chenoa James
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.96
Nisha Chandrasekharan
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Singles 14% · published
2.85
MICHELLE MESSLING
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.81
Christine Rudek
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.77
Allison Bardole
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.77
Alissa Braatz
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
Amy Shields
published 3
Casey Aghjian
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.73
Amy Germershausen
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.72
Kim Miklas
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.72
Tina Maloney
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.61
Deborah Pape
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.59
Renee LeSage
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.57
Rebecca Chiang
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Germershausen + Jackie Messler Barber5168% games+29.6% vs expected
MICHELLE MESSLING + Amy Germershausen9364% games+9.9% vs expected
MICHELLE MESSLING + Tina Maloney10265% games+9.8% vs expected
MICHELLE MESSLING + Renee LeSage91746% games+3.8% vs expected
Amy Germershausen + Renee LeSage6453% games+2.7% vs expected
Allison Bardole + Deborah Pape10850% games+1.9% vs expected
Casey Aghjian + Rebecca Chiang4936% games−9.6% vs expected
Amy Germershausen + Tina Maloney5553% games−11.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jackie Messler Barber
11W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Cara Buchanan
41W–32L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Chenoa James
24W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%39%61%
3.04
Nisha Chandrasekharan
13W–17L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
2.96
3
MICHELLE MESSLING
62W–62L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Christine Rudek
15W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Allison Bardole
14W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Alissa Braatz
10W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Amy Shields
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Casey Aghjian
7W–32L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Amy Germershausen
50W–55L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.73
Kim Miklas
11W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.72
3
Tina Maloney
23W–23L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
2.72
3
Deborah Pape
16W–30L career · 7 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
2.61
Renee LeSage
35W–61L career · 2 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
2.59
3
Rebecca Chiang
19W–35L career · 4 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
2.57

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.