Teams

Girls Just Wanna Have Fun

2023 Adult 40 and Over League · 4.5 Women

15 players · average NTRP 4.00 / MAUI

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-03-18vs Tennis is LifeLost 12
L#1 DoublesAnne Burch / Cynthia Funai vs Deb Rinaldi / Mindy Blakeslee1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDeanna DiBiase / Rita Ingstad vs Kimmie S Ouchi / Birlinda Akinaka1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesMarisa Fujimoto / Jill Kanahele vs Tracy Lauterman / Caroline Gammie6-4, 6-3
2023-02-25vs Royal Lahaina Smashing WahinesSplit 22
L#1 DoublesMarisa Fujimoto / Cynthia Funai vs Jennifer Granum / Andy Torres7-6, 1-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJill Kanahele vs Tamara Farwig6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAnne Burch / Maylynn Ikioka vs Gage Beerer / Kandy Grantz6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJeanne Dunn / Janet Berglund vs Bettina Haerer / Liezl Lao2-6, 4-6
2023-02-04vs Tennis is LifeLost 04
L#1 DoublesMarisa Fujimoto / Lori Tanaka vs Sarah Schmidt / Petra Dupont1-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesJill Kanahele vs Ligaya Acob-Powell3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDeanna DiBiase / Cynthia Funai vs Karen Sullivan / Cynthia Feike2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJeanne Dunn / Janet Berglund vs Deb Rinaldi / Tracy Lauterman3-6, 3-6
2023-01-21vs Tennis is LifeLost 03
L#1 DoublesDeanna DiBiase / Anne Burch vs Mindy Blakeslee / Tricia Wilstead2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMarisa Fujimoto / Lori Tanaka vs Melissa Nickens / Sarah Schmidt0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesRita Ingstad / Leslie Haughney vs Caroline Gammie / Rachel Christopher0-6, 3-6
2023-01-15vs Royal Lahaina Smashing WahinesWon 31
L#1 DoublesCynthia Funai / Janet King vs Irene Cummings / Melanie Brown6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAmy Reisenauer vs Andy Torres7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesRita Ingstad / Anne Burch vs Jennifer Granum / Gage Beerer6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesJill Kanahele / Deanna DiBiase vs Kandy Grantz / Tamara Farwig6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Melissa Nickens
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.92
Deanna DiBiase
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.91
Jill Kanahele
usually #1 Singles 56%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 4
3.89
Maylynn Ikioka
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.84
Rita Ingstad
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
Amy Reisenauer
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
Anne Burch
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.73
Leslie Haughney
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.66
Cynthia Funai
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 44% · published 4
3.60
Jeanne Dunn
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.56
Marisa Fujimoto
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 46% · published 4
3.40
Lori Tanaka
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Janet Berglund
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Janet King
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Sarah Schmidt
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rita Ingstad + Janet King14560% games+14.9% vs expected
Sarah Schmidt + Melissa Nickens15276% games+13.8% vs expected
Jill Kanahele + Deanna DiBiase231259% games+7.6% vs expected
Cynthia Funai + Deanna DiBiase7355% games+6.3% vs expected
Cynthia Funai + Anne Burch2346% games+3.6% vs expected
Cynthia Funai + Marisa Fujimoto3552% games+3.2% vs expected
Leslie Haughney + Rita Ingstad4258% games+0.4% vs expected
Maylynn Ikioka + Jill Kanahele10454% games+0.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Melissa Nickens
149W–42L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Deanna DiBiase
138W–103L career · 9 lines in 2023
<1%72%28%
3.92
4
Jill Kanahele
252W–165L career · 9 lines in 2023
<1%74%25%
3.91
4
Maylynn Ikioka
109W–66L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%78%22%
3.89
Rita Ingstad
61W–45L career · 8 lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.84
4
Amy Reisenauer
25W–19L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Anne Burch
39W–22L career · 8 lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Leslie Haughney
80W–48L career · 1 line in 2023
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Cynthia Funai
93W–97L career · 9 lines in 2023
13%86%1%
3.66
Jeanne Dunn
46W–76L career · 5 lines in 2023
24%75%<1%
3.60
4
Marisa Fujimoto
119W–93L career · 11 lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
3.56
3.5
Lori Tanaka
87W–110L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
3.40
Janet Berglund
29W–27L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Janet King
39W–17L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Sarah Schmidt
61W–25L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.