Teams

Simonetti/Memphis

2026 Adult 55 & Over-Memphis · 3.5 Women 55 & Over

12 players · average NTRP 3.33 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-05-09vs Goodnight/MemphisLost 03
L#1 DoublesRachel Rieves / Debra Sneed vs Maria Dannemiller / Tricia Pickett2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKaren Johnston / Brenda Armstrong vs Rebecca Conrad / Kelly Kitabchi4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesVicki Singh / Andrea Bienstock vs Kelly McCool / Gail Paige2-6, 1-6
2026-05-02vs Kershner/MemphisLost 12
W#1 DoublesRachel Rieves / Debra Sneed vs Judy Butterfield / Lori Fairless6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMartha Podesta / Shelley Spiro vs Sharon Dertien / Catherine Horton2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSusan Doane / Lisa Guyton vs Patricia Alfonso / Deborah Kershner0-6, 2-6
2026-04-25vs Richards/MemphisWon 20
W#1 DoublesDebra Sneed / Shelley Spiro vs Wendy Wider-Burroughs / Marilyn Leblanc6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMargaret Vestal / Andrea Bienstock vs Denise Martin / Lora Bridgewater6-1, 6-2
2026-04-18vs Sutton/MemphisLost 12
L#1 DoublesMargaret Vestal / Debra Sneed vs Roz Wallace / Elizabeth Novick2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesMartha Podesta / Laura Cary vs Glaucia Novoa / Ana Paula Pereira6-1, 7-5
L#3 DoublesVicki Singh / Karen Johnston vs Salina Xu / Lura Turner5-7, 6-1, 0-1
2026-04-11vs Bratton/MemphisLost 03
L#1 DoublesShelley Spiro / Debra Sneed vs Julie Parks / Nancy Goodwin2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRachel Rieves / Margaret Vestal vs Melony Bratton / Haley Carlson7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKaren Johnston / Brenda Armstrong vs Donna Wolfanger / Carolyn Santos2-6, 1-6
2026-04-01vs McCarty/MemphisLost 12
L#1 DoublesRachel Rieves / Brenda Armstrong vs Michele Smith / Randi Mullaney0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesGina Simonetti / Susan Doane vs Michelle McCarty / Leigh Norrid2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesLisa Guyton / Martha Podesta vs Kathy Wright / Eva Farris6-2, 6-4
2026-03-28vs Mills/MemphisWon 21
W#1 DoublesGina Simonetti / Rachel Rieves vs Michelle Stockton / Laura Huss7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMartha Podesta / Laura Cary vs Susan Dacus / Debbie Bryant6-3, 7-6
L#3 DoublesMargaret Vestal / Brenda Armstrong vs Debbie Churchey / Maggie Lee3-6, 4-6
2026-03-13vs Eddy/MemphisLost 03
L#1 DoublesRachel Rieves / Natalie Royal vs Diane Brower / Vonya Day5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Guyton / Debra Sneed vs Catherine Eddy / Dawn Ton3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesGina Simonetti / Martha Podesta vs Sonia Castany / Carolyn Monistere6-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Rachel Rieves
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
3.24
Gina Simonetti
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.17
Debra Sneed
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.17
Shelley Spiro
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.14
Martha Podesta
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.13
Laura Cary
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Andrea Bienstock
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.12
Margaret Vestal
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.98
Susan Doane
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.97
Natalie Royal
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.86
Brenda Armstrong
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Vicki Singh
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shelley Spiro + Debra Sneed3451% games−0.2% vs expected
Shelley Spiro + Martha Podesta134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rachel Rieves
12W–7L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.39
Gina Simonetti
3W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Debra Sneed
10W–9L career · 6 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17
Shelley Spiro
8W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17
Martha Podesta
8W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
3.14
Laura Cary
8W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.13
3
Andrea Bienstock
6W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%20%80%
3.12
Margaret Vestal
7W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.12
Susan Doane
4W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
55%45%<1%
2.98
Natalie Royal
6W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
58%42%<1%
2.97
3.5
Brenda Armstrong
3W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
84%16%<1%
2.86
Vicki Singh
0W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.