Teams

GEPTA/18&over/2.5W/Villa/EPTC#4

SouthernNewMexico · 2026 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

7 players · average NTRP 2.50 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-05-04vs GEPTA/18&over/2.5W/McCarthy/EPTC#2Lost 01
L#1 DoublesNayeli Moreno / Ana Perez vs Freneci Silva / Claudia Ponce1-6, 0-6
2026-04-27Lost 01
L#2 DoublesCristina Castro / Ana Perez vs Karla Garcia / Carla Fuentes6-2, 5-7, 0-1
2026-04-25Lost 01
L#2 DoublesAreci Jilkov / Ana Perez vs Sharon Ransom / Adriana Ludwig2-6, 2-6
2026-04-06vs GEPTA/18&over/2.5W/Boney/EPTC#3Won 10
W#2 DoublesNorma Alvarado / Ana Perez vs Monica Boney / Lluvia Martinez6-1, 6-2
2026-03-23Won 10
W#2 DoublesCristina Castro / Ana Perez vs Michelle Jabor / Christine Gomez6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesNayeli Moreno / Ana Perez vs Jessica Alvarado / Aldonza Delgado6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2026 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.29 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.30
Cristina Castro
usually #2 Doubles 62%, also #1 Doubles 39% · published 2.5
2.27
Areci Jilkov
usually #1 Singles 36%, also #2 Singles 23% · published 2.5
Ana Perez
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
Nayeli Moreno
usually #1 Doubles 53%, also #2 Doubles 35% · published
Norma Alvarado
usually #1 Doubles 64%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Suleima Villa
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published
Valentina Muir
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Suleima Villa + Valentina Muir4643% gamesnot enough data
Nayeli Moreno + Cristina Castro134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Cristina Castro
7W–6L career · 13 lines in 2026
0%93%7%
2.30
2.5
Areci Jilkov
5W–20L career · 22 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.27
Ana Perez
3W–3L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Nayeli Moreno
13W–14L career · 17 lines in 2026
not enough data
Norma Alvarado
21W–21L career · 14 lines in 2026
not enough data
Suleima Villa
21W–30L career · 32 lines in 2026
not enough data
Valentina Muir
4W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.