Teams

Chhotaray - Net Dominators

2025 Shenandoah Mixed 18 & Over · Shenandoah Mixed 18 & Over 9.0

13 players · average NTRP 4.44 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-03-25vs Loudoun Strikers- BatishWon 10
W#2 DoublesAayushi Chouhan / Thomas Cyrnak vs Stacy Stratton / Patrick Thompson6-4, 5-2
2025-03-16Won 10
W#3 DoublesKerrie Jenkins / Thomas Cyrnak vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-02-24vs Loudoun Strikers- BatishWon 10
W#2 DoublesScott Washow / Kerrie Jenkins vs Andre Siqueira / Aileen Jones6-1, 6-3
2025-02-06vs Loudoun Strikers- BatishWon 10
W#3 DoublesVijeaswaran Velusamy / Shina Kolisetti vs Patrick Thompson / Lily Riedel6-2, 7-5
2025-02-02vs Loudoun Strikers- BatishWon 20
W#2 DoublesScott Washow / Lisa Puzzuoli vs Vipul Chawla / Lily Riedel3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBavi Sadayappan / Vijeaswaran Velusamy vs Manish Desai / Erin Kaplan6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Shenandoah Mixed 18 & Over 9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.13 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.54
Thomas Cyrnak
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.36
Aravind Krishna
published 5
4.34
Vijeaswaran Velusamy
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.31
Oliver Carter
published
Bavi Sadayappan
published 4.5
4.12
Scott Washow
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.08
3.86
Cathy TAYLOR
published 4
3.86
Lisa Puzzuoli
published
3.69
Tusar Chhotaray
published 4
Kerrie Jenkins
published
Shina Kolisetti
published
Zachary Errickson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cathy TAYLOR + Tusar Chhotaray303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Thomas Cyrnak
311W–89L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%39%61%
4.54
5
Aravind Krishna
37W–48L career · no lines in 2025
86%14%<1%
4.36
4.5
Vijeaswaran Velusamy
206W–82L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%89%10%
4.34
Oliver Carter
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%7%
4.31
4.5
Bavi Sadayappan
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Scott Washow
112W–66L career · 2 lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
4.12
4.5
Jagannath Chakravarty
12W–8L career · no lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
4.08
4
Cathy TAYLOR
12W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
3.86
Lisa Puzzuoli
13W–17L career · no lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
3.86
4
Tusar Chhotaray
83W–57L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.69
Kerrie Jenkins
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Shina Kolisetti
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Zachary Errickson
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.