Teams

CV-Mission Hills CC/L Lober

2023 SoCal Doubles - CV · CV Women's 3.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for CV Women's 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.08
2.96
2.94
Nancy Pacharzina
published
2.81
Erica Carpenter
published 3
Elaine Skrepnyk
published 3
2.58
Julie Klauer
published
2.43
Laurie Lober
published
Julie George
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Obsidiana Abril-Horpel
4W–13L career · no lines in 2023
>99%<1%<1%
3.08
3
Heather Jones-Gochis
5W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%63%37%
2.96
Nancy Pacharzina
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
>99%<1%<1%
2.94
3
Erica Carpenter
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Elaine Skrepnyk
no matches on record · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Julie Klauer
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
2.58
Laurie Lober
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
70%30%<1%
2.43
Julie George
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.