Teams

OC LLW LPC - Blanco Sat9

2023 USTA Adult 40 & Over - OC WE · OC Women 4.5 WE

14 players · average NTRP 4.55 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-03-25vs OC Fullerton TC - BarbiWon 30
W#1 DoublesElisabeth Marks / Anne Nicholson vs Pat Papartassee / Su Prijyanonda4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 SinglesLaura McManus vs Megan Riley6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTamara Tayles / Kathleen Bennett vs Misty Kolchakian / Megan Osborn6-0, 6-2
2023-03-18vs OC LNRC - Carol Sat 1030Split 11
L#1 SinglesSabrina MacLachlan vs Maria O'Connor3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesLaura McManus / Dawn Ringo vs Jill Hauk / Rena Banducci6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2023-03-05vs OC RCI -Ly - Sun930Won 20
W#2 DoublesElisabeth Marks / Laura McManus vs Karissa Do / Tracy Newman6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKirtine Yang / Yolanda Legro vs Bonnie Lee / Ly Diem Nguyen Kursits6-2, 6-2
2023-03-04vs OC Los Cab - Tracy Sat1Won 21
W#1 DoublesElisabeth Marks / Joey Paynter vs Mary Konopa / Tracy Harris6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesLea Inouye / Kelly Casares vs Robin Monk / Stacey Kwasizur2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesTamara Tayles / Vicky Blanco vs Karen Char / Jackie Head6-4, 6-3
2023-02-19vs OC Fullerton TC - BarbiWon 21
W#1 DoublesLea Inouye / Kelly Casares vs Misty Kolchakian / Tiffany Lee6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesElisabeth Marks / Tamara Tayles vs Pat Papartassee / Megan Riley6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesSabrina MacLachlan / Stella Nguyen Bezabeh vs Mandy Cuan / Diana Angell7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2023-02-11vs OC LNRC - Carol Sat 1030Won 20
W#2 DoublesLaura McManus / Dawn Ringo vs Laura Myers / Margaux Kugelman6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSabrina MacLachlan / Kelly Casares vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-01-28vs OC Los Cab - Tracy Sat1Split 11
W#2 DoublesVicky Blanco / Tamara Tayles vs Jenna van der Meyden / Wendy Elliott6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLaura McManus / Kelly Casares vs Mary Konopa / Jackie Head6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2023-01-22vs OC RCI -Ly - Sun930Won 31
W#1 DoublesTamara Tayles / Yolanda Legro vs Masami Hashimoto / Karissa Do6-3, 7-6
W#1 SinglesElisabeth Marks vs Amy Ourso6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLea Inouye / Kelly Casares vs Karen Schramm / Miho Mori6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesKirtine Yang / Kathleen Bennett vs Laura Chasin / Hina Khan6-0, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Women 4.5 WE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.25 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.65
Laura McManus
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 5
4.58
Lea Inouye
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.46
Jinna Johnson
published
4.35
Tamara Tayles
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.34
Yolanda Legro
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.30
Dana Kim
published 4.5
4.28
Elisabeth Marks
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.17
Vicky Blanco
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.08
Kirtine Yang
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.03
Kathleen Bennett
published
4.03
Dawn Ringo
published 4.5
3.68
Sabrina MacLachlan
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
Kelly Casares
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tamara Tayles + Elisabeth Marks472357% games+3.1% vs expected
Laura McManus + Kirtine Yang7552% games−2.1% vs expected
Tamara Tayles + Vicky Blanco221354% games−8.8% vs expected
Vicky Blanco + Elisabeth Marks8654% gamesnot enough data
Laura McManus + Elisabeth Marks7362% gamesnot enough data
Tamara Tayles + Yolanda Legro404 matchesnot enough data
Yolanda Legro + Vicky Blanco404 matchesnot enough data
Yolanda Legro + Kirtine Yang213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Laura McManus
107W–68L career · 5 lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.65
5
Lea Inouye
50W–17L career · 3 lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.58
Jinna Johnson
0W–6L career · no lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.46
4.5
Tamara Tayles
132W–77L career · type A · 5 lines in 2023
1%86%14%
4.35
4.5
Yolanda Legro
42W–28L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%87%12%
4.34
4.5
Dana Kim
4W–10L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
4.30
4.5
Elisabeth Marks
109W–84L career · 5 lines in 2023
2%92%5%
4.28
4.5
Vicky Blanco
131W–100L career · 2 lines in 2023
11%88%1%
4.17
4.5
Kirtine Yang
71W–51L career · 2 lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
4.08
Kathleen Bennett
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
42%58%<1%
4.03
4.5
Dawn Ringo
4W–1L career · no lines in 2023
42%58%<1%
4.03
4
Sabrina MacLachlan
190W–130L career · 3 lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.68
Kelly Casares
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Stella Nguyen Bezabeh
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.