Teams

Holland

2025 ADULT 18 & OVER EARLY START · 5.0 MEN

8 players · average NTRP 4.60 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-12-20vs Johnson: GustiesSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKevin Coleman / Tucker Combs vs Alex Senjem / Luke Haddorff4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesBenjamin Yates / Clay Sollenberger vs Joseph Punnoose / Sourabh Terakanambi7-6, 2-6, 1-0
2024-11-21vs Meger: Johnnies & Co.Split 11
L#1 DoublesKevin Lewis / Clay Sollenberger vs Tim Larson / Ryan Meger7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKevin Coleman / Ben Rode vs Andrew McNutt / Matthew McNutt6-3, 6-3
2024-11-16vs King ES 5.0 2024Lost 02
L#1 DoublesKevin Lewis / Kevin Coleman vs Anh Doan / Scott Wall5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBenjamin Yates / Austin Seaverson vs Larson Ringlien / Bryan Baumann1-6, 4-6
2024-11-07vs Johnson: GustiesLost 01
L#2 DoublesTucker Combs / Ben Rode vs Sourabh Terakanambi / Luke Haddorff2-6, 0-6
2024-10-17vs Meger: Johnnies & Co.Split 11
W#1 DoublesBen Rode / Matthew Sullivan vs Thomas Prittinen / Tim Larson6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesTucker Combs / Austin Seaverson vs Andrew McNutt / Matthew McNutt5-7, 4-6
2024-10-10vs King ES 5.0 2024Lost 03
L#1 DoublesKevin Lewis / Oliver Summers vs Scott Wall / Bryan Baumann2-2
L#1 SinglesKevin Coleman vs Nick Bates6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTucker Combs / Joe Lee vs Connor O'Meara / Larson Ringlien3-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.0 MEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.30 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Ben Rode
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 5
4.59
Oliver Summers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.45
Kevin Coleman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
4.29
Aaron Holland
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4.5
Clay Sollenberger
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.22
Austin Seaverson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4.5
4.22
Tucker Combs
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
4.03
Benjamin Yates
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Aaron Holland + Benjamin Yates1440% games−4.0% vs expected
Tucker Combs + Benjamin Yates033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Ben Rode
22W–9L career · 10 lines in 2025
not enough data
Oliver Summers
29W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%27%73%
4.59
Kevin Coleman
2W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
4.45
4.5
Aaron Holland
40W–37L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
4.29
4.5
Clay Sollenberger
2W–3L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Austin Seaverson
12W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%2%
4.22
Tucker Combs
10W–17L career · 8 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
4.22
4.5
Benjamin Yates
14W–36L career · 6 lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
4.03

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.