Teams

Chisholm/Evans

Combo · 7.5 Ladies

11 players · average NTRP 3.80 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule1 upcoming · 5 played
Sep 8 7:30 PM
vs
Lubbock Country Club
2026-09-01vs WhiteLost 03
L#1 DoublesJennifer Moore / Kacy Bednarz vs Gracelyn Anderson / Kate King4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAlisha Evans / Laurie Oltmans vs Lindsey Craig / Jenni Rogers2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTiffany Fioroni / Raegan Boren vs Chelsea Schulz / Elvira Cruz1-6, 7-5, 0-1
2026-08-25vs BoggsLost 12
L#1 DoublesAmy Boren / Amy Catlin vs Lauren Holloway / Adrienne Richards5-7, 6-7
W#2 DoublesRaegan Boren / Shannon Miller vs Camille Cruz / Cody Boggs0-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAmanda Chisholm / Laurie Oltmans vs Lydia Williams / Kaley Cantu6-0, 4-6, 0-1
2026-08-18vs DaneWon 21
W#1 DoublesAlisha Evans / Amy Catlin vs Amy Gandy / Paige Dane4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAngela Trevithick / Amy Boren vs Beth Sublett / Kaily Ghilea7-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesTiffany Fioroni / Kacy Bednarz vs Shannon Isom / Kim Shewmake0-6, 4-6
2026-08-11vs WhiteLost 12
L#1 DoublesAlisha Evans / Shaunna Jensen vs Gracelyn Anderson / Kate King4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLaurie Oltmans / Amanda Chisholm vs Erica Diamond / Jenni Rogers6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAngela Trevithick / Amy Boren vs Skylar Wisdom / Elvira Cruz6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2026-08-04vs BoggsWon 21
W#1 DoublesJennifer Moore / Shaunna Jensen vs Camille Cruz / Kelly Welch6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesShannon Miller / Amy Catlin vs Lydia Williams / Adrienne Richards2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesTiffany Fioroni / Kacy Bednarz vs Kaley Cantu / Cori Hanson6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 7.5 Ladies
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1White3072972
2Chisholm/Evans21541087
3Dane12451283
4Boggs03271486

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Alisha Evans
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.72
Amy Boren
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.72
Amanda Chisholm
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.69
Angela Trevithick
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.60
Shannon Miller
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.51
Tiffany Fioroni
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.44
Amy Catlin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.40
Shaunna Jensen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.36
Kacy Bednarz
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.36
Laurie Oltmans
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.23
Raegan Boren
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alisha Evans + Amanda Chisholm3254% games+5.7% vs expected
Tiffany Fioroni + Angela Trevithick4253% games+3.7% vs expected
Amy Boren + Angela Trevithick5848% games−1.3% vs expected
Shaunna Jensen + Angela Trevithick3265% gamesnot enough data
Tiffany Fioroni + Shaunna Jensen044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alisha Evans
17W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.91
4
Amy Boren
15W–29L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Amanda Chisholm
17W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
3.5
Angela Trevithick
41W–34L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%9%91%
3.69
Shannon Miller
22W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
23%76%<1%
3.60
Tiffany Fioroni
13W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
48%52%<1%
3.51
3.5
Amy Catlin
29W–16L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
3.44
Shaunna Jensen
32W–32L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.40
Kacy Bednarz
19W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.36
Laurie Oltmans
6W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.36
Raegan Boren
6W–25L career · 5 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.