Teams

GEPTA-2.5-Adult/W(Vidovic)(CCC#1)

2022 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE · 2.5 ADULT WOMEN

5 players · average NTRP 2.50 / GREATER EL PASO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-12-05vs GEPTA-2.5-Adult/W(Lechuga)(FB)Won 10
W#2 DoublesA C / Erica Horton vs Linda Burns / Delfina Lechuga6-1, 6-0
2021-11-16vs GEPTA-2.5-Adult/W(Garcia)(EPTC#1)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesAlexa Meraz / Maggie Lindner vs Shannon Rhoads / Ariana Dominguez1-6, 2-6
2021-10-24vs GEPTA-2.5-Adult/W(Alarcon)(TW)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesKristine Garcia / Erica Horton vs Sylvia Vega / A C6-0, 2-6, 0-1
2021-10-10vs GEPTA-2.5-Adult/W(Jabor)(EPCC#1)Split 11
W#1 DoublesKristine Garcia / Erica Horton vs Taryn Hunt / Allison White6-2, 6-1
L#1 SinglesMaggie Lindner vs Barbara Basurto5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2021-10-03vs GEPTA-2.5-Adult/W(Vidovic)(CCC#2)Won 10
W#2 DoublesKristine Garcia / Autumn Follett vs Marisol Mcneil / Debra Cardona Hester6-2, 6-1
W#1 DoublesKristine Garcia / Erica Horton vs Patricia Moye Holderman / Norma Alvarado6-2, 6-1
2021-09-19vs GEPTA-2.5-Adult/W(Baeza)(EPCC#2)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMaggie Lindner / Alexa Meraz vs Vanessa Dominguez / Erika Castaneda0-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · 2.5 ADULT WOMEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GEPTA-2.5-Adult/W(Alarcon)(TW)9024310160
2GEPTA-2.5-Adult/W(Jabor)(EPCC#1)7220719163
3GEPTA-2.5-Adult/W(Fernandez)(EPTC#2)63171025228
4GEPTA-2.5-Adult/W(Vidovic)(CCC#1)54161123191
5GEPTA-2.5-Adult/W(Overly)(EPCC#3)45131429216
6GEPTA-2.5-Adult/W(Baeza)(EPCC#2)45111634230
7GEPTA-2.5-Adult/W(Navedo)(EPTC#3)1872040274
8GEPTA-2.5-Adult/W(Lechuga)(FB)1872041275
9GEPTA-2.5-Adult/W(Vidovic)(CCC#2)1842347295

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Alexa Meraz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Erica Horton
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Kristine Garcia
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Maggie Lindner
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Samantha Johnson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erica Horton + Kristine Garcia11170% games+18.6% vs expected
Alexa Meraz + Maggie Lindner1436% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Alexa Meraz
4W–12L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Erica Horton
14W–6L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kristine Garcia
23W–25L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Maggie Lindner
13W–23L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Samantha Johnson
19W–33L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.