Teams

SunPro Smashers

2026 USTA Adult 18 & Over · 3.5W AM

19 players · average NTRP 3.56 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-02vs PC MARC-Krueger/SianoWon 21
L#1 DoublesSherston Faux / Kaylene Andrew vs Dannan Siano / Tara Vold1-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesKaitlin Dixon vs Hillary Jeppsen6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesTiffany Ashman / Ellie Logan vs Kelly Krueger / Lisa Hauser6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2026-05-26Split 11
L#1 SinglesEllie Logan vs Catherine van Uitert2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesSherston Faux / Shannon Fredericks vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-05-19Won 21
L#2 DoublesKaylene Andrew / Diane Heaps vs Nicole Leatham / Betsy Ostrander6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesKaitlin Dixon vs Holly Goulding6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLaurie Lewis / Cherylin Winkel vs Cari Johnson / Brittany Pope6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2026-05-12Won 10
W#2 SinglesShannon Fredericks vs Becky Fajardo6-4, 6-1
2026-04-28vs Wasatch High School-Jonston/JonesWon 20
W#1 SinglesKaitlin Dixon vs Mindi Finlayson6-4, 6-4
W#2 SinglesShannon Fredericks vs Britta Davis6-2, 6-3
2026-04-21vs Cottonwood Club-AnnunziataLost 02
L#1 SinglesKaitlin Dixon vs Mary Diaz Gordon7-6, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCherylin Winkel / Laurie Lewis vs Kerry Davis / Jane Woolley1-6, 1-6
2026-04-14vs Ace-Harman/SwalbergWon 10
W#1 SinglesKaitlin Dixon vs Camillia Groberg6-2, 6-1
2026-04-07Won 20
W#1 SinglesKaitlin Dixon vs Naomi Stroud-Peterson6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKaylene Andrew / Shannon Fredericks vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5W AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.59
Jen Keisel
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 4
3.45
Kaitlin Dixon
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #2 Singles 17% · published
3.35
Katrina Harlan
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.35
Carolyn Barber
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
Sarah Cartwright
usually #2 Singles 57%, also #1 Singles 43% · published
3.22
Raquel Westover
usually #1 Singles 42%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.20
Diane Heaps
usually #1 Doubles 69%, also #3 Doubles 15% · published 3.5
3.18
Kelly Mortensen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.18
Kaylene Andrew
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.16
Tiffany Ashman
usually #2 Doubles 53%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published
3.14
Jenni Warner
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.14
Shannon Fredericks
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.09
Lori Curtis
usually #3 Doubles 36%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published
3.02
Cherylin Winkel
usually #2 Doubles 35%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
2.98
Krista Stewart
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.97
Sherston Faux
usually #2 Doubles 47%, also #3 Doubles 37% · published 3.5
2.93
Laurie Lewis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Ellie Logan
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Julie Edwards
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Krista Stewart + Diane Heaps4655% games+13.7% vs expected
Laurie Lewis + Krista Stewart6255% games+6.3% vs expected
Kaylene Andrew + Krista Stewart2643% games+3.6% vs expected
Tiffany Ashman + Jenni Warner6550% games+2.9% vs expected
Jenni Warner + Diane Heaps10657% games+2.1% vs expected
Jenni Warner + Sherston Faux4348% games+1.1% vs expected
Laurie Lewis + Diane Heaps51243% games+0.3% vs expected
Kelly Mortensen + Carolyn Barber18855% games−0.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jen Keisel
2W–6L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.59
Kaitlin Dixon
30W–5L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
3.45
3.5
Katrina Harlan
127W–128L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%85%15%
3.35
3.5
Carolyn Barber
88W–75L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%86%14%
3.35
Sarah Cartwright
5W–6L career · 7 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.30
3.5
Raquel Westover
113W–129L career · 11 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Diane Heaps
92W–121L career · 13 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.20
Kelly Mortensen
110W–103L career · 6 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
Kaylene Andrew
48W–68L career · 2 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
Tiffany Ashman
97W–89L career · 15 lines in 2026
13%87%1%
3.16
3.5
Jenni Warner
61W–68L career · 5 lines in 2026
15%84%1%
3.14
3.5
Shannon Fredericks
89W–63L career · 4 lines in 2026
16%84%1%
3.14
Lori Curtis
85W–110L career · 11 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.09
3.5
Cherylin Winkel
112W–142L career · 16 lines in 2026
44%56%<1%
3.02
Krista Stewart
27W–58L career · 7 lines in 2026
55%45%<1%
2.98
3.5
Sherston Faux
88W–157L career · 19 lines in 2026
58%42%<1%
2.97
Laurie Lewis
40W–68L career · 2 lines in 2026
68%32%<1%
2.93
Ellie Logan
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Julie Edwards
36W–41L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.