Teams

GJTC PDANIELS

2022 ITA MIXED DOUBLES - WS · MIXED 8.5 - ITA - WS

11 players · average NTRP 4.17 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-08-24vs GJTC TKELLERSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMikael Jurkovic / Jenna Berguin vs Brandon Keller / Amber Skillicorn6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesNick Rutan / Carrie Thornton vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-08-03vs GJTC TKELLERLost 01
L#2 DoublesBryan Baughman / Jenna Berguin vs Brandon Keller / Amber Skillicorn2-6, 4-6
2022-07-27vs GJTC LSHARPWon 10
W#3 DoublesCarrie Thornton / Nick Rutan vs Brian Alano / Tina Hulihee6-2, 6-3
2022-07-13vs GJTC LSHARPLost 02
L#1 DoublesMikael Jurkovic / Laureen Cantwell vs Lisa Sharp / Michael Mehmedbasich3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAngeline Norman / Nick Rutan vs Denise Faber / Brian Alano4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-07-13vs GJTC TKELLERLost 02
L#2 DoublesNick Rutan / Jenna Berguin vs Brandon Keller / Amber Skillicorn6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJohn Aggen / Laureen Cantwell vs Brian Ballard / Kimberly Black6-7, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 8.5 - ITA - WS have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.90 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.35
Angeline Norman
published 4.5
4.06
Lisa Poudrier
published 4
4.00
Jenna Berguin
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.93
Nick Rutan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.82
Bryan Baughman
published 4
3.74
Katie Mosher
published
3.69
Carrie Thornton
published 4
3.61
Laureen Cantwell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
John Aggen
published
Mikael Jurkovic
published
Patti Daniels
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jenna Berguin + Bryan Baughman131250% games+1.1% vs expected
Lisa Poudrier + Bryan Baughman5845% games−7.5% vs expected
Laureen Cantwell + Mikael Jurkovic4549% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Angeline Norman
12W–19L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
4.35
4
Lisa Poudrier
77W–58L career · type A · no lines in 2022
<1%32%68%
4.06
4.5
Jenna Berguin
74W–58L career · 3 lines in 2022
52%48%<1%
4.00
4
Nick Rutan
116W–25L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%71%29%
3.93
4
Bryan Baughman
79W–47L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.82
Katie Mosher
15W–15L career · no lines in 2022
98%2%<1%
3.74
4
Carrie Thornton
60W–57L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
Laureen Cantwell
27W–78L career · 2 lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.61
John Aggen
5W–11L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mikael Jurkovic
10W–15L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Patti Daniels
11W–25L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.