Teams

SSC Weitzel 7.5 Men

2022 Sarasota Combo 18 & Over Fall Weekend · 7.5 M Saturday

14 players · average NTRP 3.67 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-12-10vs Sarasota/RosenbergWon 20
W#2 DoublesPeter Laughlin / Lance Schilling vs Greg Logan / Dale Slimick6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesNate Macksey / Robin Klein vs Dave Barcomb / Dustin Keith6-1, 6-3
2022-11-19vs Sarasota/RosenbergWon 10
W#2 DoublesNate Macksey / Lance Schilling vs David Brumby / Dustin Keith6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2022-11-16vs LWR Anderson/PerellaWon 10
W#1 DoublesScott Temple / Peter Laughlin vs Luke Anderson / R Hughes7-6, 6-7, 1-0
2022-10-29vs Sarasota/RosenbergSplit 11
L#1 DoublesPeter Laughlin / Marc Solomon vs David Rosenberg / Greg Logan4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesLance Schilling / Nate Macksey vs Bradley Sutter / Vivek Kumar6-2, 6-2
2022-10-15Won 10
W#1 DoublesPeter Laughlin / Nader Massoumi vs Luke Anderson / Ken Chapman Jr1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-10-04vs Sarasota/RosenbergLost 01
L#2 DoublesPeter Laughlin / Robin Klein vs David Rosenberg / David Brumby0-6, 1-6
2022-09-24vs LWR Anderson/PerellaWon 10
W#1 DoublesNate Macksey / Nader Massoumi vs Scott Buelter / Jeff Neubauer6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 M Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Nate Macksey
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.82
Barney Akierman
published 4
3.78
Gustavo Risquez
published 4
3.72
Peter Laughlin
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.69
Marc Solomon
published
3.68
Eric Abbott
published 4
3.60
RON NOURSE
published
3.57
Nader Massoumi
published
3.31
Scott Temple
published
Anthony Homer
published 3.5
3.23
James Protigal
published 3.5
2.94
Cyndi Weitzel
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Lance Schilling
published
Robin Klein
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Peter Laughlin + Gustavo Risquez2450% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nate Macksey
70W–38L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
3.92
4
Barney Akierman
20W–8L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Gustavo Risquez
206W–175L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.78
Peter Laughlin
76W–44L career · 5 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.72
Marc Solomon
9W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%7%93%
3.69
4
Eric Abbott
11W–4L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.68
RON NOURSE
4W–9L career · no lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.60
Nader Massoumi
4W–4L career · no lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
3.57
Scott Temple
7W–9L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%8%
3.31
3.5
Anthony Homer
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
James Protigal
9W–5L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
3
Cyndi Weitzel
73W–73L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%67%33%
2.94
Lance Schilling
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Robin Klein
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.