Teams

Overserved

2023 USTA MIXED 18 and OVER - BOISE · TV

16 players · average NTRP 3.20 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2023-04-15vs Serving AcesSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAndrea Lambe / Anthony Olbrich vs Colleen Trese / James Horner6-0, 6-4
L#2 DoublesStacey Noble / Matthew Rubio vs Kevin Hartsig / Cassie Horner4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2023-04-08vs Double Trouble ETCLost 01
L#2 DoublesJacqueline Lawley / Bryan Lawley vs Phillip Bowden / Michele Bowden7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2023-04-01vs Strung TightWon 20
W#1 DoublesJacqueline Lawley / Bryan Lawley vs Jennifer Boyd / Jim Baker6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAndrea Lambe / Scott Johnson vs Heidi Linzbach / Tom Young6-2, 6-2
2023-03-26vs Win GoldSplit 11
W#1 DoublesBryan Lawley / Jacqueline Lawley vs Alyson Brown / Michael Armstrong6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesWoody Kessler / Farrell Kessler vs Sydney Lewis / Jason Bish1-6, 0-6
2023-03-25vs Dominetters 6.0Won 10
W#2 DoublesStacey Noble / Frederick Noble vs Chris Angermayer / Stacey Kozakar7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2023-03-19vs VAMOSSplit 11
W#2 DoublesBryan Lawley / Jacqueline Lawley vs Gilbert Rodriguez / Andrea Straub6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesFrederick Noble / Stacey Noble vs Tony Auston / Wendy Bee Ping Ong Mullin7-6, 5-7, 0-1
2023-03-18vs Serving AcesSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMichelle McSorley / Anthony Olbrich vs Colleen Trese / Joel Gongora6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesStacey Noble / Frederick Noble vs Sandra Holmes / James Horner6-2, 6-1
2023-03-12vs Double Trouble ETCLost 01
L#2 DoublesJacqueline Lawley / Scott Johnson vs Rebecca Clift-French / Stanley French0-6, 2-6
2023-03-05Lost 01
L#3 DoublesAmy Costello / Frederick Noble vs Mary-Katherine Ekins / Todd Merritt4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2023-03-03Won 10
W#3 DoublesMichelle McSorley / Anthony Olbrich vs Sydney Lewis / Michael Armstrong6-2, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Double Trouble ETC102261028269
2Overserved84221435293
3Dominetters 6.057191738307
4Strung Tight57171942304
5Serving Aces21092760396
6Win Gold11163061368

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Andrea Lambe
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.31
Bryan Lawley
published 3.5
3.29
Tannan Koehl
published
3.13
Matthew Rubio
published 3
3.12
Farrell Kessler
published 3
3.11
Amy Costello
published 3.5
3.01
2.87
Sandi Rubio
published 3
2.67
Emily Beckmann
published 3
2.52
Matt Koehl
published 3
2.25
Anthony Olbrich
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Frederick Noble
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Jacqueline Lawley
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
James Beckmann
published
Stacey Noble
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Woody Kessler
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tannan Koehl + Matt Koehl151154% games+3.6% vs expected
Sandi Rubio + Matthew Rubio111147% games−6.7% vs expected
Jacqueline Lawley + Bryan Lawley10459% gamesnot enough data
Farrell Kessler + Woody Kessler4841% gamesnot enough data
Frederick Noble + Stacey Noble3349% gamesnot enough data
Michelle McSorley + Anthony Olbrich224 matchesnot enough data
Farrell Kessler + Bryan Lawley303 matchesnot enough data
Farrell Kessler + Matt Koehl213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Andrea Lambe
43W–38L career · 2 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.73
3.5
Bryan Lawley
55W–36L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%9%
3.31
Tannan Koehl
92W–61L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.29
3
Matthew Rubio
77W–78L career · no lines in 2023
<1%18%82%
3.13
3
Farrell Kessler
106W–81L career · no lines in 2023
<1%19%81%
3.12
3.5
Amy Costello
147W–95L career · type A · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.11
3
Michelle McSorley
72W–49L career · no lines in 2023
<1%47%53%
3.01
3
Sandi Rubio
63W–51L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
2.87
3
Emily Beckmann
62W–53L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
2.67
3
Matt Koehl
57W–73L career · no lines in 2023
46%54%<1%
2.52
3
Anthony Olbrich
13W–46L career · 3 lines in 2023
96%4%<1%
2.25
Frederick Noble
6W–20L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Jacqueline Lawley
50W–38L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
James Beckmann
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Stacey Noble
7W–7L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Woody Kessler
7W–17L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.