Teams

BLACKHAWK CC 65AM6.0A

2025 ADULT 65&Over · Men 6.0

7 players · average NTRP 2.88 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
L#2 DoublesTimm Miller / Ali Moazed vs Duane Duchscherer / Manohar S Sohal2-6, 2-6
2025-03-24vs LANEY TA/BAY TREES PK 65AM6.0ALost 01
L#2 DoublesAli Moazed / Chuck Columbus vs Nick Halatsis / Stuart Gronningen6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2025-03-19vs LANEY TA/BAY TREES PK 65AM6.0ASplit 11
W#1 DoublesTimm Miller / Chuck Columbus vs Duane Duchscherer / Nick Halatsis6-1, 0-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDean Williams / Ali Moazed vs Bob Koury / Manohar S Sohal3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2025-02-24vs LANEY TA/BAY TREES PK 65AM6.0ASplit 11
L#2 DoublesAli Moazed / Chuck Columbus vs Roger Lambert / Fred Teregul2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesDean Williams / Jim Plewa vs Bob Koury / Manohar S Sohal7-6, 6-4
2025-02-10vs NorCal/Hayes/65&Over6.0MLost 02
L#1 DoublesJim Plewa / Dean Williams vs Duane Duchscherer / Stuart Gronningen4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDan Chuba / Chuck Columbus vs Bill Freeman / Rich Reitman0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.45 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Dan Chuba
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.62
Jim Plewa
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.54
Andy Lee
published 3
2.50
Ali Moazed
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.48
Steve Lassig
published
2.09
Chuck Columbus
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Timm Miller
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Timm Miller + Ali Moazed123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Dan Chuba
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jim Plewa
1W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
19%80%<1%
2.62
3
Andy Lee
6W–22L career · no lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
2.54
3
Ali Moazed
1W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
2.50
Steve Lassig
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
56%44%<1%
2.48
2.5
Chuck Columbus
1W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.09
Timm Miller
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.