Teams

Western: Fire Balls

2025 40&Over Women · 3.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.12 / WESTERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-09vs May the Tape Be With YouWon 21
W#1 DoublesKelley Vanslander / Susan Robbins vs Marlene Dashkoff / Ruthanne Wannop6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJane Fuller / Kim Athans vs Sarah Rugnetta / Seshi Campbell3-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesCecile Morris / Denise Piechowski vs Holly Freed / Lisa Streng6-0, 6-0
2025-07-02vs Ace KickersLost 12
L#1 DoublesDonna Decarolis / Sukyung Woo vs Kim Collins / Paula Zagrobelny3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesLilian Mclellan / Robin Wolfgang vs Cynthia Albrecht / Sandra Picerno6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPenny Cipolla / Virginia Filiaci vs Cheryl Gelder / Laurel Oliver3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-06-18vs May the Tape Be With YouWon 31
W#1 DoublesJane Fuller / Virginia Filiaci vs Heather Wronski-Garland / Anne Hoehn6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesKelley Vanslander vs Tessa Flores6-4, 4-0
L#2 DoublesDonna Decarolis / Cecile Morris vs Rhonda Wieder / Suzanne Krycia6-7, 4-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSusan Robbins / Rachel Silva vs Sarah Rugnetta / Seshi Campbell6-3, 6-4
2025-06-11vs Ace KickersSplit 22
W#1 DoublesRobin Wolfgang / Lilian Mclellan vs Laurel Oliver / Paula Zagrobelny7-5, 6-2
W#1 SinglesKelley Vanslander vs Karen Perna1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPenny Cipolla / Sukyung Woo vs Joanne Mendiola / Kim Collins3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDenise Piechowski / Kim Athans vs Sandra Picerno / Amy Hulse4-6, 3-6
2025-05-28vs May the Tape Be With YouWon 40
W#1 DoublesAmy King / Jane Fuller vs Anne Hoehn / Jeannine Higgins6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesLilian Mclellan vs Marsha Huard6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesPenny Cipolla / Sukyung Woo vs Ruthanne Wannop / Sherry Frost6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSusan Robbins / Rachel Silva vs Lisa Streng / Holly Freed6-3, 6-1
2025-05-21vs Ace KickersWon 30
W#1 DoublesKelley Vanslander / Robin Wolfgang vs Paula Zagrobelny / Sandra Picerno6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDonna Decarolis / Lilian Mclellan vs Cynthia Albrecht / Joanne Mendiola6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSukyung Woo / Virginia Filiaci vs Amy Hulse / Julie Lunghino5-7, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Western: Fire Balls0618616166
2May the Tape Be With You0632143276

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Amy King
published 3.5
3.25
Lilian Mclellan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.09
Kelley Vanslander
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.96
Robin Wolfgang
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.92
Cecile Morris
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.91
Virginia Filiaci
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.87
Penny Cipolla
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.87
Sukyung Woo
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.74
Denise Piechowski
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
Rachel Silva
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.66
Donna Decarolis
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.63
Jane Fuller
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.54
Susan Robbins
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.45
Kim Athans
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jane Fuller + Kim Athans5262% games+12.5% vs expected
Virginia Filiaci + Susan Robbins5357% games+9.6% vs expected
Robin Wolfgang + Kelley Vanslander11554% games+5.4% vs expected
Lilian Mclellan + Donna Decarolis3258% games+4.0% vs expected
Virginia Filiaci + Jane Fuller7654% games+2.9% vs expected
Penny Cipolla + Virginia Filiaci9753% games+0.8% vs expected
Penny Cipolla + Susan Robbins9752% games+0.3% vs expected
Robin Wolfgang + Virginia Filiaci8454% games−3.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Amy King
6W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.38
3.5
Lilian Mclellan
65W–44L career · 6 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.25
Kelley Vanslander
62W–47L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%23%77%
3.09
3
Robin Wolfgang
64W–36L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
2.96
3
Cecile Morris
55W–63L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
2.92
3
Virginia Filiaci
68W–70L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
2.91
Penny Cipolla
39W–31L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%84%15%
2.87
Sukyung Woo
9W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%84%15%
2.87
3
Denise Piechowski
12W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
2.74
Rachel Silva
31W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Donna Decarolis
63W–61L career · 3 lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
2.66
3
Jane Fuller
66W–82L career · 3 lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
2.63
Susan Robbins
25W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
2.54
Kim Athans
24W–51L career · 2 lines in 2025
66%34%<1%
2.45

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.