Teams

DeKalb TC (Tyler Fabbri)*

USTA Atlanta Summer - 18 & Over Men - Regular · 3.5 Men (Sean Vergara)

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2026-05-31Split 11
L#1 SinglesJames McLeod vs Joseph Gutierrez1-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesJeff Riggs vs Kohlman Kramer6-4, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men (Sean Vergara) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Jeff Riggs
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.63
Jayson Shannon
published
3.51
Tyler Fabbri
published
3.46
James McLeod
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.41
Daniel Winkel
published 3.5
3.38
Luben Raytchev
published
3.38
Suman Raju
published
3.35
Faiz Ahmad
published
3.34
James Lord
published
3.33
Matthias Grube
published
3.29
Kyle Lewis
published
3.28
Morgan Wand
published
David OBanion
published 3.5
3.23
Nicholas Terpstra
published
John Petrequin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeff Riggs + James McLeod7255% games+12.7% vs expected
Kyle Lewis + Tyler Fabbri224 matchesnot enough data
Morgan Wand + Jeff Riggs314 matchesnot enough data
Daniel Winkel + Jeff Riggs314 matchesnot enough data
Morgan Wand + Suman Raju123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeff Riggs
18W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
3.79
Jayson Shannon
9W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%19%81%
3.63
Tyler Fabbri
10W–7L career · no lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
3.51
James McLeod
17W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
63%37%<1%
3.46
3.5
Daniel Winkel
14W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.41
Luben Raytchev
9W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%20%
3.38
Suman Raju
7W–12L career · no lines in 2025
80%20%<1%
3.38
Faiz Ahmad
9W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%15%
3.35
James Lord
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
87%13%<1%
3.34
Matthias Grube
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
88%12%<1%
3.33
Kyle Lewis
9W–11L career · no lines in 2025
93%7%<1%
3.29
Morgan Wand
7W–14L career · no lines in 2025
94%6%<1%
3.28
3.5
David OBanion
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Nicholas Terpstra
6W–7L career · no lines in 2025
97%3%<1%
3.23
John Petrequin
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.