Teams

NJ BLACK

2023 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · MEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-05-31vs BTA-C GREYWon 21
W#1 DoublesKenton Wride / Matt Farling vs Ty Gee / Andrew Grolnick6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesHenry Carson vs David Zavala6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesEric Huelson / Craig Tierney vs Kevin Davis / Eduardo Martinez Escalante3-6, 2-6
2023-05-24vs CVTA BLUEWon 30
W#1 DoublesMatt Farling / Per Westholm vs Thomas Lastick / Jason Sutula6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesHenry Carson vs Tim Graves6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesJonathan Hall / Eric Huelson vs Thomas Tessier / Marc Katzin6-4, 6-1
2023-05-17vs LTA-Q YELLOWWon 30
W#1 DoublesMatt Farling / Kenton Wride vs Paul Franko / Bret Simon7-5, 6-3
W#1 SinglesHenry Carson vs Weston Nassar6-4, 6-3
W#2 SinglesEric Huelson vs Dmitry Smirnov6-2, 7-6
2023-05-10Won 10
W#1 SinglesMatt Farling vs Kevin Kramer6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2023-05-03vs RCC REDLost 02
L#1 SinglesHenry Carson vs Sam Getlan2-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesEric Huelson vs Tristan Burm5-7, 5-7
2023-04-26vs BTA-C GREYLost 02
L#1 SinglesHenry Carson vs Donald Bergal4-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesMatt Farling vs David Zavala3-6, 3-6
2023-04-19vs CVTA BLUEWon 20
W#1 SinglesHenry Carson vs Riley Conroy4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 SinglesMatt Farling vs Timothy Tyrrell6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.81 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Henry Carson
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.93
Eric Huelson
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.81
Greg Fisher
published
3.81
Alan Shkolnikov
published 4
3.79
Matt Farling
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.76
Per Westholm
published
3.76
Bradley Jessen
published 4
3.65
Kenton Wride
published
Josh Nations
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Greg Fisher + Per Westholm5065% games+11.6% vs expected
Kenton Wride + Matt Farling3649% games−1.9% vs expected
Greg Fisher + Bradley Jessen5353% games−3.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Henry Carson
80W–34L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%65%35%
3.95
4
Eric Huelson
73W–41L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%68%32%
3.93
Greg Fisher
26W–9L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%8%
3.81
4
Alan Shkolnikov
9W–2L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%8%
3.81
4
Matt Farling
48W–35L career · 6 lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.79
Per Westholm
7W–3L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.76
4
Bradley Jessen
12W–9L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.76
Kenton Wride
6W–10L career · no lines in 2023
14%85%1%
3.65
Josh Nations
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.