Teams

Spinderellas

2023 Prince Georges Tri-Level 18 & Over · Prince George's Tri-Level 3.5, 3.0, 2.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.36 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-11-11vs Different StrokesLost 01
L#2 DoublesGale Powell / Gwendolyn Vauss vs Staci Steward / Colleen Quinlan5-7, 2-6
2023-11-04vs RacqueteersLost 01
L#2 DoublesGale Powell / Charla Moss vs Jane Kim / Kathleen Eder6-7, 1-6
2023-10-28vs LoVV Lo-TriSplit 11
W#1 DoublesTia Briscoe / Tracy Walls vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesGale Powell / Gwendolyn Vauss vs Plezzie Heade / SHAMEKA JENNINGS3-6, 1-6
2023-10-22vs Lady AcersWon 10
W#2 DoublesGwendolyn Vauss / Gale Powell vs Angela Gallacher / Diana Williams Gibau6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2023-10-21vs Serving YouLost 01
L#2 DoublesGale Powell / Charla Moss vs Casey Royster / Catherine Wynne1-6, 4-6
2023-10-15vs RacqueteersLost 01
L#2 DoublesMichelle Johnson / Gale Powell vs Andrea Torres / Marissa Schmauch Womble4-6, 1-6
2023-10-08vs LoVV Mid-TriSplit 11
W#1 DoublesClaris Brock / Tia Briscoe vs Mia Piansay / Andaiye Hamilton6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesGwendolyn Vauss / Charla Moss vs Sheila Jennings / Darlene Walker1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Prince George's Tri-Level 3.5, 3.0, 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Tia Briscoe
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.52
Deborah Thompson
published 3.5
3.46
Claris Brock
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.22
Mia Dozier
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.15
Tracy Walls
published
Charla Moss
published 3
2.52
Gale Powell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.41
Kay Kalber
published
2.34
Gwendolyn Vauss
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deborah Thompson + Tracy Walls8452% games+4.3% vs expected
Tia Briscoe + Claris Brock8157% games+2.7% vs expected
Gwendolyn Vauss + Gale Powell31039% games−8.0% vs expected
Gwendolyn Vauss + Claris Brock2445% gamesnot enough data
Mia Dozier + Claris Brock224 matchesnot enough data
Gwendolyn Vauss + Mia Dozier213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Tia Briscoe
286W–132L career · 2 lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.60
3.5
Deborah Thompson
80W–53L career · no lines in 2023
<1%45%55%
3.52
3.5
Claris Brock
420W–275L career · 8 lines in 2023
<1%63%37%
3.46
3.5
Mia Dozier
84W–78L career · 3 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.22
Tracy Walls
23W–32L career · no lines in 2023
12%88%<1%
3.15
3
Charla Moss
6W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Gale Powell
36W–66L career · 6 lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
2.52
Kay Kalber
5W–12L career · no lines in 2023
0%76%24%
2.41
3
Gwendolyn Vauss
43W–122L career · type A · 4 lines in 2023
89%11%<1%
2.34

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.