Teams

GEPTA/65&over/7.0W/Orozco/TW

SouthernNewMexico · 2025 USA ADULT 65 & OVER LEAGUE

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-10-22Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSusan Lyon / Blythe Larson vs Gabriela Stoiber / Elizabeth Wakefield1-6, 1-6
2025-10-13Lost 01
L#2 DoublesBlythe Larson / Karen McVay vs Gerla Gallardo / Gabriela Stoiber1-6, 0-6
2025-09-13Lost 01
L#2 DoublesBlythe Larson / Shelley Danforth vs Ellen Hughes / Gerla Gallardo1-6, 1-6
2025-09-10Lost 01
L#2 DoublesLaura Orozco / Blythe Larson vs Guadalupe Castillo / Ursula Morawietz3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2025 USA ADULT 65 & OVER LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.26
Blythe Larson
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.10
Christa de Regules
usually #3 Doubles 27%, also #2 Doubles 23% · published 3.5
2.86
Harri Baumann
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
Karen McVay
usually #1 Doubles 45%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published
Laura Orozco
usually #3 Doubles 45%, also #2 Doubles 39% · published
Michele Cicchetti
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 39% · published
Patricia Mehl
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Shelley Danforth
usually #1 Doubles 70%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Thelma Campos
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Orozco + Christa de Regules71246% games+4.8% vs expected
Thelma Campos + Michele Cicchetti5351% games+1.9% vs expected
Laura Orozco + Harri Baumann1435% gamesnot enough data
Thelma Campos + Christa de Regules123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Blythe Larson
10W–21L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Christa de Regules
37W–65L career · 25 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.10
3.5
Harri Baumann
28W–46L career · 7 lines in 2025
85%15%<1%
2.86
Karen McVay
60W–86L career · 29 lines in 2025
not enough data
Laura Orozco
52W–108L career · 31 lines in 2025
not enough data
Michele Cicchetti
53W–109L career · 26 lines in 2025
not enough data
Patricia Mehl
20W–27L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Shelley Danforth
21W–32L career · 20 lines in 2025
not enough data
Thelma Campos
57W–51L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.