Teams

N OR-PTC-Borosky

2024 Adult 40 & Over · 4.5 Men

10 players · average NTRP 4.45 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 4.09 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.25
Eugene Jung
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
Brian Jackson
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.24
Bryan Ward
published 4.5
4.24
Josh Schweitz
published 4.5
4.17
Mitchell Strauss
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.09
Jimmy Shen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.05
David Vant Hof
published 4.5
4.02
Ry Koteen
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 4.5
4.01
Arthur Kowitch
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
3.78
Bart Borosky
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
Results15 ties
2024-10-26Won 10
W#4 DoublesBryan Ward / Ry Koteen vs Byron Hailey / Bill Zindler6-4, 6-0
2024-10-26Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJosh Schweitz / Ry Koteen vs Jason Go / Tony Klemptner6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2024-10-25Won 10
W#4 DoublesBryan Ward / Ry Koteen vs Taylor Lawton / David Biermann4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-08-25Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJohn Ezelle / Ry Koteen vs Frank Collie / Brandt Wegner7-6, 6-4
2024-08-23Won 10
W#3 DoublesBryan Ward / Ry Koteen vs Kerry Bucklin / Tim Larson6-3, 6-3
2024-06-30Won 10
W#3 DoublesJohn Ezelle / Mitchell Strauss vs Rudd McGarity / Jack Yothers6-1, 6-1
2024-06-29Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJosh Schweitz / Ry Koteen vs Corey Kincaid / Joshua Owens7-6, 6-4
2024-06-16Won 30
W#1 DoublesEugene Jung / Juan Presichi vs Augusto Carneiro / Jan Wich-Herrlein6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBryan Ward / Ry Koteen vs Brad Wade / Ken Blancher6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesDaniel Larsen / Brian Jackson vs Ajay Kumar Tippisetti / Michael Jung6-3, 6-1
2024-06-08Lost 02
L#2 DoublesJosh Schweitz / Arthur Kowitch vs Jeremy Morris / Jimmy Crumpacker2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBrian Jackson / Ry Koteen vs Adrien Leemin / James Luu3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-05-24Won 21
W#1 DoublesBrian Jackson / Eugene Jung vs Nathan Austin / Dirk Koopman6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBryan Ward / Ry Koteen vs Christopher Haddon / Ryan Pitman6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesArthur Kowitch / Mitchell Strauss vs Daniel Tseng / Doug Post6-4, 7-6
2024-05-18Lost 01
L#3 DoublesRy Koteen / Marc Milobinski vs Toby Krauel / Greg Masson6-4, 6-1
2024-05-11Won 10
W#1 DoublesJohn Ezelle / Arthur Kowitch vs David Sturdyvin / Don Roberts7-5, 6-3
2024-05-04Won 20
W#2 DoublesJosh Schweitz / Arthur Kowitch vs Jon Monson / Hector M Salomon6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesEugene Jung / Brian Jackson vs Brian Dehen / Michael Chang6-0, 6-0
2024-04-28Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMitchell Strauss / Jimmy Shen vs Butch Dela Cruz / Steve Vanderploeg6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2024-04-19Won 20
W#2 DoublesJosh Schweitz / Arthur Kowitch vs Christopher Haddon / Mark Simpson6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesBrian Jackson / Eugene Jung vs Nathan Austin / Reza Kafi7-5, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Eugene Jung
112W–35L career
0%97%2%
4.25
4.5
Brian Jackson
33W–18L career
not enough data
4.5
Bryan Ward
36W–15L career
0%99%1%
4.24
4.5
Josh Schweitz
58W–30L career
0%98%2%
4.24
4.5
Mitchell Strauss
57W–43L career
1%98%0%
4.17
4.5
Jimmy Shen
23W–29L career
4%96%0%
4.09
4.5
David Vant Hof
89W–41L career
9%91%0%
4.05
4.5
Ry Koteen
49W–49L career
19%81%0%
4.02
4.5
Arthur Kowitch
66W–33L career
22%78%0%
4.01
4
Bart Borosky
45W–47L career
5%91%5%
3.78

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.