Teams

WI Adult 55&O 7.0W Day GML Lake County WAC Rozman

2024 WI Adult 55 & Over Summer 7.0 W Day · 2024 WI Adult 55 & Over Summer 7.0 W (day)

14 players · average NTRP 3.42 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
L#1 DoublesHeidi Rozman / Candace Dingmann vs Sarah Griffin / Kathy Gridley7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAnne OCallaghan / Julie Graf vs Deborah Kass / Anne Peterson1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesKathryn Tweet / Amy Marshall vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#1 DoublesLisa Kopfer / Kristin Hieb vs Sarah Griffin / Jodi Joerres3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJulie Graf / Anne OCallaghan vs Kathy Gridley / Ann Pierson1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesKathryn Tweet / Rose Tsang vs Anne Peterson / Deborah Kass4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 DoublesRose Tsang / Amy Marshall vs Sarah Griffin / Ann Pierson0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesCandace Dingmann / Janet Jansky vs Jodi Joerres / Kathy Gridley6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSusan Schmidt / Carla Allsop vs Linda Gomoll / Sigrid Miller6-1, 6-0
L#1 DoublesMichelle Webster / Shirley Yagoda vs Sarah Griffin / Jodi Joerres3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesLisa Kopfer / Kathryn Tweet vs Deborah Kass / Anne Peterson7-6, 6-1
L#3 DoublesHeidi Rozman / Anne OCallaghan vs Linda Gomoll / Kathy Gridley4-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesVirginia Walters / Kristin Hieb vs Ann Pierson / Kathy Gridley6-1, 0-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCarla Allsop / Susan Schmidt vs Carolyn Abbinante / Anne Peterson6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJulie Graf / Amy Marshall vs Sigrid Miller / Tammy Laing6-1, 6-1
W#1 DoublesMichelle Webster / Shirley Yagoda vs Deborah Kass / Jodi Joerres6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLisa Kopfer / Janet Jansky vs Tammy Laing / Anne Peterson6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesCarla Allsop / Susan Schmidt vs DEBORAH HOLSEN / Sigrid Miller6-1, 1-0
W#1 DoublesMichelle Webster / Shirley Yagoda vs Ann Pierson / Jodi Joerres6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLisa Kopfer / Janet Jansky vs Kathy Gridley / Linda Gomoll7-5, 6-1
L#3 DoublesRose Tsang / Kristin Hieb vs Sarah Griffin / Deborah Kass7-5, 5-7, 0-1
L#1 DoublesKristin Hieb / Virginia Walters vs Sarah Griffin / Jodi Joerres0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesCarla Allsop / Susan Schmidt vs Carolyn Abbinante / Deborah Kass6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLisa Kopfer / Rose Tsang vs Anne Peterson / Sigrid Miller6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 2024 WI Adult 55 & Over Summer 7.0 W (day)
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WI Adult 55&O 7.0W Day GML Lake County WAC Rozman53141023180
2WI Adult 55&O 7.0W Day GML Oconomowoc Lake Kass35101432223

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
Michelle Webster
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.50
Julie Graf
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.38
Janet Jansky
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.33
Carla Allsop
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.28
Lisa Kopfer
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Candace Dingmann
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.22
Rose Tsang
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.18
Kristin Hieb
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.16
Heidi Rozman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.14
Kathryn Tweet
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.89
Shirley Yagoda
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.86
Anne OCallaghan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Amy Marshall
published 3
Virginia Walters
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heidi Rozman + Julie Graf14266% games+10.7% vs expected
Heidi Rozman + Janet Jansky5257% games+4.2% vs expected
Lisa Kopfer + Carla Allsop6354% games+3.9% vs expected
Janet Jansky + Carla Allsop5653% games+0.8% vs expected
Kathryn Tweet + Janet Jansky8356% gamesnot enough data
Heidi Rozman + Kristin Hieb5550% gamesnot enough data
Julie Graf + Kathryn Tweet6082% gamesnot enough data
Rose Tsang + Kathryn Tweet224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Michelle Webster
224W–118L career · 3 lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.74
3.5
Julie Graf
91W–31L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%51%49%
3.50
3.5
Janet Jansky
50W–37L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Carla Allsop
66W–56L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Lisa Kopfer
48W–46L career · 5 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Candace Dingmann
13W–7L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Rose Tsang
25W–20L career · 4 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Kristin Hieb
59W–51L career · 4 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Heidi Rozman
114W–81L career · 2 lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.16
3.5
Kathryn Tweet
91W–61L career · 3 lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.14
3
Shirley Yagoda
155W–105L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
2.89
3
Anne OCallaghan
22W–14L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%83%16%
2.86
3
Amy Marshall
1W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Virginia Walters
18W–16L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.