Teams

55 & Over W7.0 - Baldrich Coro Calderón

Adult 55 & Over 2022 · Adult 55 & Over W7.0-Flight 2

11 players · average NTRP 3.21 / PUERTO RICO

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
W#2 DoublesAnnabelle Rodriguez-Llauger / Hazel Rojas vs Maritza Duran / Margaret Lopez4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMaria Vargas / Evelyn Marrero vs Kathy Brayfield / Arelis Mena2-2
L#2 DoublesEvelyn Marrero / Maria Vargas vs Daisy Bernier / Yolanda Rivera2-6, 2-3
L#3 DoublesSonia Hormaza / Hazel Rojas vs Nelida Plaza / Esther Portalatin6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2022-03-12Lost 01
L#3 DoublesMaria Vargas / Hazel Rojas vs Carmen Naranjo / Ana Corrada5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMaria Vargas / Socorro Calderon vs Carmen Rios / Charmaine Negron7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesHazel Rojas / Annabelle Rodriguez-Llauger vs Maritza Rivera / Yamira Rivera5-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesEvelyn Marrero / Maria Vargas vs Abby Pons / Yolanda Rivera7-6, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMaria Vargas / Evelyn Marrero vs Malen Rodriguez / Arelis Mena6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2022-02-13Lost 01
L#1 DoublesThelma Biaggi / Hazel Rojas vs Ana Corrada / Sara PiedradeRivera5-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over W7.0-Flight 2 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.66 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Elvia Cribben
published 3.5
Evelyn Marrero
published 3.5
2.89
Maria Vargas
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Carmen Reyes
published 3
Deshia Maldonado
published 3
2.64
Hazel Rojas
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.46
Socorro Calderon
published
Johanna Padro
published
Sonia Hormaza
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Thelma Biaggi
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carmen Reyes + Thelma Biaggi044 matchesnot enough data
Hazel Rojas + Deshia Maldonado123 matchesnot enough data
Socorro Calderon + Carmen Reyes033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Annabelle Rodriguez-Llauger
0W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Elvia Cribben
1W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Evelyn Marrero
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Maria Vargas
24W–40L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
2.89
3
Carmen Reyes
0W–12L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Deshia Maldonado
3W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Hazel Rojas
12W–47L career · 5 lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
2.64
Socorro Calderon
15W–43L career · no lines in 2022
62%38%<1%
2.46
Johanna Padro
25W–24L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sonia Hormaza
31W–41L career · 9 lines in 2022
not enough data
Thelma Biaggi
0W–10L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.