Teams

Avalon Ghita Men

2021 Richmond Tri-Level Weeknight · Weeknight Wed

10 players · average NTRP 3.58 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-11-06vs TCRC Young's RACLost 01
L#1 DoublesYan Wu / Lyman Brown vs Robert Preservati / Tim Parks3-6, 4-6
2021-11-01Won 10
W#1 DoublesYan Wu / Lyman Brown vs John Liscio / John Berry6-2, 7-5
2021-10-31vs Woodlake UrbanLost 01
L#1 DoublesLyman Brown / Andrew Zima vs Eric Estes / Ken Patterson5-7, 1-6
2021-10-13Lost 01
L#1 DoublesYan Wu / Lyman Brown vs Chad Anderson / Jon Morris5-7, 7-6, 0-1
2021-09-29Lost 01
L#1 DoublesYan Wu / Lyman Brown vs Ryan Baker / Matthew Cline3-6, 5-7
2021-09-08vs ACAC FieldsLost 01
L#1 DoublesAndrew Zima / Lyman Brown vs Jeff Bosch / Chris Naughton4-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Weeknight Wed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Andrew Zima
published 4
3.54
Lyman Brown
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.49
Jesse Pasco
published
3.33
Brad Williamson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.32
Richard Bland
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.30
Gabriel Ghita
published 3.5
3.17
Vikram Nagulan
published
2.88
Rob Henley
published
2.65
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brad Williamson + Richard Bland241253% games+0.8% vs expected
Gabriel Ghita + Richard Bland1442% gamesnot enough data
Lyman Brown + Brad Williamson033 matchesnot enough data
Brad Williamson + Gabriel Ghita123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Andrew Zima
23W–20L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Lyman Brown
183W–205L career · 6 lines in 2021
36%64%<1%
3.54
Jesse Pasco
22W–11L career · no lines in 2021
<1%54%46%
3.49
3.5
Brad Williamson
176W–167L career · 6 lines in 2021
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Richard Bland
251W–138L career · 5 lines in 2021
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Gabriel Ghita
137W–80L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.30
Vikram Nagulan
9W–9L career · no lines in 2021
10%90%1%
3.17
Rob Henley
10W–11L career · no lines in 2021
<1%82%18%
2.88
3
Istvan Godri Martis
6W–14L career · no lines in 2021
12%87%<1%
2.65
Sorin Uram-Tuculescu
3W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.