Teams

EFSC - Ohlin

2026 Brevard Adult 18 & Over · 2.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women

10 players · average NTRP 2.50 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-05-13vs Brevard/WoodsLost 12
L#1 DoublesMackenzie Sloan / Daniella Archer vs Chonda Rodrigo-butler / Michelle Kne0-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesVida Zou vs Deborah Smith6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesGabriella Collura / Elizabeth Thorne vs Lynn Barratt / Michelle Lawley1-6, 3-6
2026-05-06vs Kiwi - KonradLost 12
L#1 DoublesCalli Ohlin / Alix Amozig vs Laleh Sharifzadeh / Susan Hala6-7, 0-6
W#1 SinglesVida Zou vs Morgan Anderson6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJenna Bajus / Mackenzie Sloan vs Stacy Konrad / Katey Benne1-6, 4-6
2026-04-18vs Brevard/WoodsLost 03
L#1 DoublesAlix Amozig / Jenna Bajus vs Chonda Rodrigo-butler / Linda Mesnard3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesCalli Ohlin vs Danielle Carlson0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBrianna Stevens / Mackenzie Sloan vs Michelle Lawley / Catherine Ferreira2-6, 1-6
2026-04-12vs Kiwi - KonradLost 03
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Thorne / Daniella Archer vs Stacy Konrad / Katey Benne0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesCalli Ohlin vs Eileen Bennett1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMackenzie Sloan / Alix Amozig vs Pam Mcfadden / Susan Hala1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.00 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.48
Kelly Norman
published
2.31
Vida Zou
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.02
Jenna Bajus
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
1.99
Mackenzie Sloan
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
1.99
Alix Amozig
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
1.87
Calli Ohlin
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
1.87
Elizabeth Thorne
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
1.80
Daniella Archer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
1.71
Brianna Stevens
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Gabriella Collura
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Calli Ohlin + Brianna Stevens033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kelly Norman
5W–5L career · no lines in 2026
>99%<1%<1%
2.48
Vida Zou
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%91%9%
2.31
Jenna Bajus
1W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.02
Mackenzie Sloan
1W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.99
2.5
Alix Amozig
1W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.99
2.5
Calli Ohlin
0W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.87
Elizabeth Thorne
2W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.87
2.5
Daniella Archer
1W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.80
2.5
Brianna Stevens
0W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.71
Gabriella Collura
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.