Teams

Deuces Wild/Beerman - T. Love

2022 Polk Adult 40 & Over - Women · 3.0 Adult 40 & Over - Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-05-10vs Beerman - Grieger/EspitiaSplit 11
W#1 DoublesTiffany Love / Geraldine Tardy vs Gwen Wearing-Davis / Jennifer Rogers6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesRosa Jean / Alice Collins vs Eva Mora / Ginger Davis2-6, 0-6
2022-04-26vs Polk - Alley Cats/TchipanovaLost 01
L#3 DoublesJulie Goodwin / Geraldine Tardy vs Allison Sorenson / Karen Hogg3-6, 6-7
2022-04-19vs Beerman - Grieger/EspitiaSplit 11
W#1 SinglesGeraldine Tardy vs Svetlana Darrow6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesAlice Collins / Rosa Jean vs Laurie Grieger / Diane Barrera3-6, 3-6
2022-04-12vs Lakeland Country Club - S. NormanSplit 11
W#1 SinglesGeraldine Tardy vs Brandy Lansford6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRosa Jean / Alice Collins vs Sandra Campisi / Deanna Bayless5-7, 1-6
2022-04-05vs Polk - Alley Cats/TchipanovaSplit 11
W#1 SinglesGeraldine Tardy vs Jihyeon Choe6-0, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTiffany Choe / Rosa Jean vs Desiree Tchipanova / Allison Sorenson0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 40 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Tiffany Choe
published
3.47
Tiffany Love
published
3.15
Leslie Simmons
published
3.00
Mandy Jarrett
published 3
2.90
Geraldine Tardy
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #1 Singles 38% · published 3
2.57
Julie Goodwin
published
2.51
Rosalinda Collins
published
2.35
Rosa Jean
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Wendy Delgado
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leslie Simmons + Tiffany Love10461% games+9.7% vs expected
Geraldine Tardy + Mandy Jarrett4452% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tiffany Choe
11W–16L career · no lines in 2022
<1%44%56%
3.52
Tiffany Love
20W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%59%41%
3.47
Leslie Simmons
17W–13L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.15
3
Mandy Jarrett
73W–46L career · no lines in 2022
<1%51%49%
3.00
3
Geraldine Tardy
102W–114L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
2.90
Julie Goodwin
6W–21L career · no lines in 2022
29%71%<1%
2.57
Rosalinda Collins
5W–5L career · no lines in 2022
47%53%<1%
2.51
Rosa Jean
28W–56L career · 4 lines in 2022
87%13%<1%
2.35
Wendy Delgado
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.