Teams

GLVR-Lee/Daoud

2025 Mixed 40 & Over · 6.0 Mixed

11 players · average NTRP 3 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.23
Tim Janes
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.87
Jeny Joseph
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.86
Lysa Morla Maxey
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.85
Michael Navarro
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.85
David Prescott
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.84
Yone Akagi
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.78
Ed de la Fuente
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Kate Maher
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
Amy Carolan
published 3
2.73
Bill Barnes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.71
Katja Daoud
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Results8 ties
2025-08-08Split 11
L#1 DoublesTim Janes / Jeny Joseph vs Joel Naumoff / Hannah O'Brien6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLysa Morla Maxey / Michael Navarro vs Adrienne Dedelow / Brian Parker6-2, 6-4
2025-07-20Won 21
W#1 DoublesEd de la Fuente / Lysa Morla Maxey vs Anne Larson / Mubashir Cheema6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesYone Akagi / Steve Siegel vs Jinmi Kemple / Nathan Watson7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKatja Daoud / Scott Myers vs Susan Wang / Frank Ferschweiler6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2025-07-18Won 20
W#1 DoublesEd de la Fuente / Jeny Joseph vs Troy Pickard / Tracey Forrest4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDavid Prescott / Lysa Morla Maxey vs Elizabeth Large / Jeff Kovel6-2, 6-2
2025-07-13Lost 12
W#1 DoublesJeny Joseph / Tim Janes vs SHAWNA THOMPSON / Jeff Perry2-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRose Lee / Michael Navarro vs Ivy Lane / Gilbert Chiang6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLysa Morla Maxey / David Prescott vs Rhonda Baker / Mike Baker6-3, 6-2
2025-07-12Won 30
W#1 DoublesEd de la Fuente / Kate Maher vs Vicki Mark / Jonathan Guinn6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTim Janes / Lysa Morla Maxey vs Heather Dale / Mark Lau7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJeny Joseph / Michael Navarro vs Audrey Crespo / Santiago Crespo6-1, 6-4
2025-07-05Lost 01
L#2 DoublesYone Akagi / David Prescott vs Janice Kuo / Johan Hong6-1, 6-1
2025-06-29Split 11
W#1 DoublesEd de la Fuente / Kate Maher vs Qiming Wang / Qin Lian6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMichael Navarro / Katja Daoud vs John Yu / Phyllis Shen6-1, 7-5
2025-06-15Lost 02
L#1 DoublesLysa Morla Maxey / David Prescott vs Jeff Marcus / Irina Stolerman7-6, 6-0
L#2 DoublesKatja Daoud / Bill Barnes vs Michael Lemmons / Karen Walker7-6, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3
Tim Janes
47W–53L career
0%18%82%
3.23
3
Jeny Joseph
75W–91L career
0%98%2%
2.87
3
Lysa Morla Maxey
32W–15L career
0%98%2%
2.86
3
Michael Navarro
27W–39L career
0%97%3%
2.85
3
David Prescott
44W–47L career
1%91%8%
2.85
3
Yone Akagi
66W–52L career
0%98%2%
2.84
3
Ed de la Fuente
78W–81L career
0%99%0%
2.78
3
Kate Maher
36W–11L career
not enough data
3
Amy Carolan
30W–27L career
1%99%0%
2.73
3
Bill Barnes
11W–17L career · type M
2%98%0%
2.73
3
Katja Daoud
71W–70L career
2%98%0%
2.71

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.