Teams

GEPTA/18&over/4.5M/Friedl/EPTC#1

SouthernNewMexico · 2026 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

14 players · average NTRP 4.50 / GEPTA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 2026 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.26 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.34
James Marquez Williams
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4.5
4.33
Andres Madrid
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 22% · published 4.5
4.31
Edgar Ruiz
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 4.5
Gustavo Ganem
published 4.5
4.08
Fermin Escalante
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 4.5
Julio Cesar CastaNEDA
usually #3 Doubles 28%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published
Marco Gonzalez Friedl
usually #3 Doubles 34%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published
Ralu Hinojos
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published
Ramon Barreno
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Rohan Maiti
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Timothy Cantrell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Timothy Vida
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
Weston White
usually #2 Doubles 64%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published
Wilfredo Fonseca
usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andres Madrid + Julio Cesar CastaNEDA2644% gamesnot enough data
Ramon Barreno + Edgar Ruiz033 matchesnot enough data
Ramon Barreno + Fermin Escalante213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
James Marquez Williams
7W–5L career · 11 lines in 2026
<1%89%11%
4.34
4.5
Andres Madrid
25W–22L career · 16 lines in 2026
1%90%10%
4.33
4.5
Edgar Ruiz
41W–35L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
4.31
4.5
Gustavo Ganem
18W–17L career · type A · no lines in 2026
not enough data
4.5
Fermin Escalante
47W–32L career · 20 lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
4.08
Julio Cesar CastaNEDA
20W–26L career · 17 lines in 2026
not enough data
Marco Gonzalez Friedl
83W–110L career · 31 lines in 2026
not enough data
Ralu Hinojos
52W–38L career · 14 lines in 2026
not enough data
Ramon Barreno
44W–25L career · 8 lines in 2026
not enough data
Rohan Maiti
4W–7L career · 7 lines in 2026
not enough data
Timothy Cantrell
43W–59L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Timothy Vida
10W–45L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Weston White
30W–16L career · 14 lines in 2026
not enough data
Wilfredo Fonseca
47W–41L career · 11 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.