Teams

Smashing 24/7

2022 DC WTA Combo · DC WTA Combo 7.5 Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.78 / WASHINGTON D.C.

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-10-02vs Chip N ChargeWon 10
W#1 DoublesOrlando Delgado / FAUSTINO SANCHEZ vs Francisco Santos / Shawn Drury6-3, 5-3
2022-09-25vs Chip N ChargeLost 01
L#2 DoublesOrlando Delgado / Austin Visk vs Francisco Santos / Christopher Graves2-6, 4-6
2022-09-18vs Chip N ChargeWon 10
W#3 DoublesAustin Visk / Demetrius Crawford vs Matthew Ganney / Kevin Hudak6-4, 6-1
2022-09-11vs Chip N ChargeLost 01
L#1 DoublesDemetrius Crawford / Akash Agrawal vs William Bates / Adam Johnson2-6, 1-6
2022-08-21vs Chip N ChargeLost 01
L#2 DoublesOrlando Delgado / Horace Martin vs Tom Oda / Christopher Graves4-6, 2-6
2022-08-14Won 10
W#3 DoublesOrlando Delgado / Kevin Joy vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-08-10vs Chip N ChargeLost 01
L#3 DoublesOrlando Delgado / Charles Wardell vs Randall Brater / James Rowe1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for DC WTA Combo 7.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

FAUSTINO SANCHEZ
published 4.5
3.86
Akash Agrawal
published 4
3.78
Jonathan K Martin
published
3.73
Demetrius Crawford
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.64
Orlando Delgado
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Austin Visk
published 3.5
Charles Wardell
published 3.5
David Murray
published 3.5
Ian Jones
published 3.5
Horace Martin
published
Jonathan W Martin
published
Kevin Joy
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

FAUSTINO SANCHEZ + Orlando Delgado3346% games−12.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
FAUSTINO SANCHEZ
7W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Akash Agrawal
21W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
3.86
Jonathan K Martin
22W–24L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.78
4
Christopher Grant
27W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Demetrius Crawford
204W–161L career · 4 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
3.5
Orlando Delgado
168W–64L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%14%86%
3.64
3.5
Austin Visk
30W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Charles Wardell
0W–1L career · type M · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
David Murray
no matches on record · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Ian Jones
5W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Horace Martin
0W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jonathan W Martin
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kevin Joy
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.