Teams

Amelia National Mueller

2026 Duval Adult 55 & Over - Women ESL Fall · 6.0 W Saturday

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_2

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-12-13vs Deercreek KurtzLost 01
L#1 DoublesCasey Calkins / Judy Kawczak vs Karen Sayre / Stephanie Engelhardt3-6, 3-6
2025-12-06vs Eagle Landing Brink 55 6.0Won 21
L#1 DoublesCathy Mueller / Xiaoyan Shi vs Maureen Ruiz / Robbie Brogna6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCasey Calkins / Brooke Rowland vs Rebecca Padgett / Teresa Scott6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesKim Halpin / Vicki Corrington vs Angela Uva / Charlotte White6-3, 6-3
2025-11-22vs SJCC CrabtreeWon 21
L#1 DoublesJudy Kawczak / Maria Dillahunt vs Leslie Morgan / Margaret Samuels2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCathy Mueller / Casey Calkins vs Phyllis Crabtree / Tracy Libby6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesChong White / Vicki Corrington vs Meg Sheffield / Evelyn Tovar2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-11-15vs Eagle Landing Brink 55 6.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesJudy Kawczak / Casey Calkins vs Maureen Ruiz / Rebecca Padgett2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMelinda Karlsson / Xiaoyan Shi vs Nikki Warner / Robbie Brogna6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMaria Dillahunt / Kim Halpin vs Teresa Scott / Janie Simpson6-7, 7-6, 0-1
2025-11-08vs Deercreek KurtzLost 03
L#1 DoublesCathy Mueller / Judy Kawczak vs Melissa Kurtz / Tina Schumacher3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesXiaoyan Shi / Maria Dillahunt vs Karen Sayre / Janet Daechsel0-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesVicki Corrington / Mary Tinman vs Jill Cole / Julie Scott1-6, 2-6
2025-11-01vs SJCC CrabtreeLost 12
W#1 DoublesCasey Calkins / Judy Kawczak vs Stacy Clark / Melody Longstreth2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesVicki Corrington / Mary Tinman vs Cynthia Hodges / Evelyn Tovar1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMelinda Karlsson / Kim Halpin vs Diane Martin / Tracy Libby6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2025-10-25vs Eagle Landing Brink 55 6.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesCasey Calkins / Cathy Mueller vs MaryLynn Karpicki / Rebecca Padgett2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBrooke Rowland / Maria Dillahunt vs Mylina Eldredge / Karen Papworth3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesVicki Corrington / Chong White vs Angela Uva / Teresa Scott6-2, 6-3
2025-10-11vs SJCC CrabtreeLost 03
L#1 DoublesJudy Kawczak / Melinda Karlsson vs Leslie Morgan / Melody Longstreth3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesChong White / Denise Kublbock vs Stacy Clark / Phyllis Crabtree1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMary Tinman / Xiaoyan Shi vs Cynthia Hodges / Meg Sheffield2-6, 5-7
2025-09-27vs Deercreek KurtzWon 21
W#1 DoublesCasey Calkins / Cathy Mueller vs Reba Shrewsbury / Tina Schumacher6-3, 0-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKim Halpin / Vicki Corrington vs Melissa Kurtz / Stephanie Engelhardt0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesMaria Dillahunt / Judy Kawczak vs Elizabeth Mavelle / Julie Scott6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.74 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.76
Cathy Mueller
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.76
Brooke Rowland
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Denise Kublbock
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
Casey Calkins
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.69
Chong White
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Judy Kawczak
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published
Kim Halpin
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Maria Dillahunt
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Mary Tinman
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Melinda Karlsson
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Vicki Corrington
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Xiaoyan Shi
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brooke Rowland + Melinda Karlsson2348% gamesnot enough data
Casey Calkins + Cathy Mueller3248% gamesnot enough data
Kim Halpin + Vicki Corrington3247% gamesnot enough data
Judy Kawczak + Casey Calkins123 matchesnot enough data
Melinda Karlsson + Cathy Mueller123 matchesnot enough data
Chong White + Vicki Corrington213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Cathy Mueller
5W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.76
3
Brooke Rowland
6W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.76
3
Denise Kublbock
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
3
Casey Calkins
5W–7L career · 7 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Chong White
2W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
2.69
Judy Kawczak
5W–16L career · 7 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kim Halpin
4W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Maria Dillahunt
2W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mary Tinman
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Melinda Karlsson
3W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Vicki Corrington
5W–7L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Xiaoyan Shi
0W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.