Teams

Lair/LR/Rebs

2026 Combo 18 & Over 2.5, 6.5, 8.5, 10.5 · 6.5 Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.25 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 upcoming · 2 played
Sep 15 7:30 PM
at ATA Team/LR/BP
Burns Park Tennis Center
Oct 1 6:00 PM
Burns Park Tennis Center
Oct 5 7:30 PM
Rebsamen Tennis Center
Oct 13 6:00 PM
Rebsamen Tennis Center
2026-09-03vs McVinney/LR/RebLost 02
L#1 DoublesJeff Hankins / Christopher Stewart vs Spencer Mathews / Chris Halket2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesRob Christian / Ryan Allmond vs Collin Cahill / George Rainey1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-08-26vs Massey/LR/BurnsWon 21
L#1 DoublesChristopher Stewart / Rob Christian vs Nicholas Brady / Sean Massey4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJames Bryant / Jess Griffin vs Joe Childers / Brady Adkins7-5, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJeff Hankins / Pat Shoulders vs Johnathan Armstrong / Christian Wilson6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Clark Cogbill
published 3.5
3.34
Jeff Hankins
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.33
Ryan Allmond
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
James Bryant
published 3.5
3.20
Rob Christian
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.20
Stan Belue
published
3.14
Scott Polk
published
3.12
Craig Lair
published 3.5
2.92
Grant Morshedi
published 3
2.76
Jess Griffin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.61
Aaron Bunner
published 3
Pat Shoulders
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Craig Lair + Clark Cogbill3548% games−0.1% vs expected
Jeff Hankins + Scott Polk224 matchesnot enough data
Jeff Hankins + Craig Lair224 matchesnot enough data
Rob Christian + Clark Cogbill224 matchesnot enough data
Jeff Hankins + Stan Belue213 matchesnot enough data
Rob Christian + Craig Lair213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Clark Cogbill
15W–21L career · no lines in 2026
<1%89%11%
3.34
Jeff Hankins
36W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%89%11%
3.34
Ryan Allmond
28W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%1%99%
3.33
3.5
James Bryant
9W–6L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Rob Christian
21W–23L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.20
Stan Belue
26W–29L career · no lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.20
Scott Polk
12W–15L career · no lines in 2026
14%85%<1%
3.14
3.5
Craig Lair
27W–19L career · no lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.12
3
Grant Morshedi
29W–24L career · no lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
2.92
Jess Griffin
19W–19L career · 1 line in 2026
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Christopher Stewart
3W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Aaron Bunner
4W–5L career · type S · no lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
2.61
Pat Shoulders
2W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.