Teams

Winter winners/Heritage Bay / Larkin

2025 Collier Adult 18 & Over Spring · 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women

16 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-05-13vs Palmira - FontanaWon 10
W#2 DoublesRamsay Erickson / Mia Delk vs Yadira Alcolea / Brooke Sykes6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2025-05-06vs Riverstone / DiDonatoWon 10
W#3 DoublesMia Delk / Heather Larkin vs Amy Schiffer / Sharon Powidzki7-5, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Emily Burstein
published
3.49
Zoe Lefort
published
3.42
Krista Lombardo
published
3.37
Mara Mazza
published
3.35
Laila Puntel
published
3.33
Nackey Piedrahita
published
3.31
Ashley Buehler
published 3.5
3.31
Mia Delk
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.29
Heather Larkin
published
3.29
Ramsay Erickson
published
3.26
Gabriela Chahwan
published
3.24
LISA HAMILTON
published
3.23
Cheryl Comes
published 3.5
3.19
Maristela Battilana
published
3.10
Victoria Pollock
published
2.79
Betsy Brace
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gabriela Chahwan + Mia Delk224 matchesnot enough data
Gabriela Chahwan + Maristela Battilana134 matchesnot enough data
Krista Lombardo + Maristela Battilana303 matchesnot enough data
LISA HAMILTON + Emily Burstein213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Emily Burstein
13W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.50
Zoe Lefort
6W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
3.49
Krista Lombardo
17W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.42
Mara Mazza
25W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.37
Laila Puntel
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.35
Nackey Piedrahita
14W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Ashley Buehler
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.31
3.5
Mia Delk
270W–303L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.31
Heather Larkin
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Ramsay Erickson
16W–25L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Gabriela Chahwan
10W–14L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.26
LISA HAMILTON
8W–12L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.24
3.5
Cheryl Comes
11W–7L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Maristela Battilana
9W–11L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Victoria Pollock
10W–13L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.10
3.5
Betsy Brace
0W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2025
93%7%<1%
2.79

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.