Teams

BHSC-Welch

2023 Charlottesville Mixed 40 & Over · Charlottesville Mixed 40 & Over 8.0

9 players · average NTRP 4.10 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-07-28vs HOPS & DROPS-BazydloLost 02
L#1 DoublesBeth McCarthy / Luke Fairborn vs CAROLYN WARD / John Oliver2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesHowell Fendley / Mary Beth Cancienne vs Lindsay Bazydlo / Michael Cline6-7, 5-7
2023-07-23vs HEDS/KICK ACES-EwingWon 20
W#1 DoublesLuke Fairborn / Beth McCarthy vs Qian Cai / Rene Roy6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesMary Beth Cancienne / Daniel Carlson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-07-22vs ACAC-DeSouzaSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLuke Fairborn / Mary Beth Cancienne vs Chip Grobmyer / Tammy Hertel5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesWilliam Manning / Lesley Hock vs Edward Lis / Catherine DeSouza6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2023-06-25vs ACAC-DeSouzaWon 10
W#3 DoublesLuke Fairborn / Mary Beth Cancienne vs Edward Lis / Janie Shrader6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2023-06-17vs HOPS & DROPS-BazydloLost 03
L#1 DoublesLuke Fairborn / Beverley Garbaccio vs Lindsay Bazydlo / Ed Leary2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMary Beth Cancienne / Howell Fendley vs CAROLYN WARD / Michael Cline3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesIan Caskill / Lesley Hock vs John Oliver / Lisa Jett4-6, 3-6
2023-06-04vs ACAC-DeSouzaSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLuke Fairborn / Beth McCarthy vs Jordan Barr / Tammy Hertel2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesIan Caskill / Lesley Hock vs Chip Grobmyer / Gina Mancuso6-3, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Charlottesville Mixed 40 & Over 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Daniel Carlson
published 4.5
3.90
Luke Fairborn
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.80
William Manning
published
3.74
Ian Caskill
usually #3 Doubles 64%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 4
3.57
Lesley Hock
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.52
Mary Beth Cancienne
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
Joan Carlson
published
Lynette Meynig
published
Peter Welch
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Luke Fairborn + Mary Beth Cancienne213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Daniel Carlson
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Luke Fairborn
99W–57L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
3.90
William Manning
6W–2L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.80
4
Ian Caskill
71W–43L career · 11 lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.74
4
Lesley Hock
43W–49L career · 3 lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
3.57
4
Mary Beth Cancienne
82W–72L career · 5 lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
3.52
Joan Carlson
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lynette Meynig
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Peter Welch
4W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.