Teams

Morris/18/7.5/CWN/XU

2026 NO Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women Night · 7.5 NO (18&O) Women Night

14 players · average NTRP 3.67 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2026-08-26vs Butler/18/7.5/CWN/NOLTCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesShannon Morris / Elizabeth Nix vs Alexis Butler / Renee Labadie2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMichele Spansel / Darsey Williams vs Katherine Brent Talavera / Emily Kupperman6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 NO (18&O) Women Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Barbora Favret
published 4
3.73
Helene Barnett
published
3.41
Jessica Barnett
published
3.38
Kendra Seaman
published
3.37
Shelley Adams
published
3.36
Michele Spansel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Paige Giavotella
published
3.31
Shannon Morris
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
Laura Bernard
published
3.19
Brook Kerrigan
published 3.5
3.18
3.02
Leslie Clark
published
3.01
Meghan Stander
published
Elizabeth Nix
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brook Kerrigan + Shelley Adams5060% games+8.1% vs expected
Paige Giavotella + Jessica Barnett13756% games+3.7% vs expected
Shelley Adams + Laura Bernard224 matchesnot enough data
Brook Kerrigan + Laura Bernard213 matchesnot enough data
Brook Kerrigan + Michele Spansel213 matchesnot enough data
Shelley Adams + Michele Spansel303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Barbora Favret
30W–21L career · no lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
3.92
Helene Barnett
30W–35L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
Jessica Barnett
32W–21L career · no lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.41
Kendra Seaman
28W–7L career · no lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.38
Shelley Adams
25W–13L career · no lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.37
Michele Spansel
24W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%83%16%
3.36
Paige Giavotella
18W–10L career · no lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
Shannon Morris
34W–18L career · 1 line in 2026
1%90%8%
3.31
Laura Bernard
23W–12L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Brook Kerrigan
50W–23L career · no lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Claire Daigrepont Andry
5W–3L career · no lines in 2026
9%89%1%
3.18
Leslie Clark
1W–2L career · no lines in 2026
43%56%<1%
3.02
Meghan Stander
21W–21L career · no lines in 2026
<1%48%52%
3.01
Elizabeth Nix
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.