Teams

1. April

2025 NO LEAGUE · ADMIN USE ONLY

24 players · average NTRP 3.36 / MARYLAND

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for ADMIN USE ONLY have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 22 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.39
Jennifer Holliday
published
4.27
Jin Lei
published
4.20
Christine Becer
published 4.5
4.01
Bo Gao
published 4
3.49
Chengyin Wu
published 3.5
3.33
Daniel Laczko
published 3.5
3.31
Daphne Fuller
published 3.5
3.28
Andaiye Hamilton
published 3.5
3.23
Stephanie Ahmed
published
3.21
Marc Favors
published 3.5
3.11
Prashila Dullabh
published 3
3.04
Eunice Winfree
published 3
2.92
Kathy Greene
published
2.90
Denese Cavanaugh
published 3
2.87
Catherine Iosue
published 3
2.83
Jennifer Shure
published
2.83
Lorena Alfaro
published 3
2.83
Vincent Wong
published
2.80
Donna Jones
published
2.74
Bronwen Williams
published 3
2.58
2.10
William Gibson
published
Elizabeth Larson
published
Laurel Murphy
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cecilia-Hien Phan + Eunice Winfree91248% games+6.7% vs expected
Catherine Iosue + Kathy Greene123 matchesnot enough data
Donna Jones + Kathy Greene213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Holliday
31W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
4.39
Jin Lei
20W–1L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
4.27
4.5
Christine Becer
270W–177L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
4.20
4
Bo Gao
23W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
4.01
3.5
Chengyin Wu
87W–33L career · no lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
3.49
3.5
Daniel Laczko
7W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.33
3.5
Daphne Fuller
60W–93L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Andaiye Hamilton
305W–151L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Stephanie Ahmed
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Marc Favors
54W–48L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.21
3
Prashila Dullabh
91W–60L career · no lines in 2025
<1%21%79%
3.11
3
Eunice Winfree
79W–78L career · no lines in 2025
<1%37%63%
3.04
Kathy Greene
31W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%71%28%
2.92
3
Denese Cavanaugh
147W–104L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.90
3
Catherine Iosue
127W–112L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
2.87
Jennifer Shure
5W–9L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%12%
2.83
3
Lorena Alfaro
134W–151L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
Vincent Wong
0W–6L career · no lines in 2025
89%11%<1%
2.83
Donna Jones
21W–21L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.80
3
Bronwen Williams
109W–99L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.74
3
Cecilia-Hien Phan
140W–186L career · no lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
2.58
William Gibson
2W–9L career · no lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
2.10
Elizabeth Larson
4W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Laurel Murphy
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.