Teams

4 ACAC/Davis Lobs of Fun!

2025 Richmond Adult 40 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 40 & Over Weekend 3.5 Women

16 players · average NTRP 3.44 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
W#1 SinglesNatalie Lewis vs Cecilia Bergh7-5, 4-2
2025-06-29vs 12 MRTC Battery Park 3.5 HawleyLost 01
L#1 DoublesBetsy Civilette / Natalie Lewis vs Louise McCool / Alysa Cargiulo4-6, 0-6
2025-06-28vs 2 TDC CarlyleWon 10
W#1 SinglesNatalie Lewis vs Melanie Eccard6-3, 6-2
2025-06-20vs 11 Southampton BrownWon 10
W#1 SinglesNatalie Lewis vs Deena Kretzer6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 40 & Over Weekend 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Charmaine Nerone
published 3.5
3.40
Jessica Bufford
published
3.27
Betsy Civilette
published 3.5
3.26
Stacy McLeod
published
3.21
Jean Davis
published
3.16
Dawn Kelsey
published 3.5
3.11
Erika King
published 3.5
3.11
Carol Pfeiffer
published 3.5
3.10
Natalie Lewis
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.08
Amanda Monger
published 3.5
3.04
Annmarie Strachan
published 3.5
3.00
Joanne Wilson
published
2.99
Patti Bryan
published
2.89
Ashley Curtis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
Theresa Bartholomew
published
Tatiana Bueno
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Betsy Civilette + Jean Davis123 matchesnot enough data
Natalie Lewis + Jessica Bufford213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Charmaine Nerone
22W–20L career · no lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.48
Jessica Bufford
28W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.40
3.5
Betsy Civilette
12W–17L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
Stacy McLeod
15W–10L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%3%
3.26
Jean Davis
24W–23L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
Dawn Kelsey
7W–11L career · no lines in 2025
11%89%<1%
3.16
3.5
Erika King
8W–8L career · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.11
3.5
Carol Pfeiffer
9W–16L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.11
3.5
Natalie Lewis
142W–128L career · 5 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.10
3.5
Amanda Monger
4W–10L career · no lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.08
3.5
Annmarie Strachan
8W–15L career · no lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
3.04
Joanne Wilson
15W–16L career · no lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
3.00
Patti Bryan
16W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
2.99
3
Ashley Curtis
47W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.89
Theresa Bartholomew
5W–10L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
2.69
Tatiana Bueno
7W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.