Teams

Carrollwood Making a Raquet - K. Mills

2024 Hillsborough Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Adult 18 & Over Day- Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.30 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#1 DoublesKrista Mills / Lacy Gregory vs Erin Posey / Carlee Revoy7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesRaquel Pullaro / Becky Kuntz vs Melissa Sparks / Erin Lobner1-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesKristin Nail vs Catherine Kotson6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMichelle Mcclendon / Karen Wingard vs Maria Karina Espinoza / Renee Rasmussen5-7, 6-1, 1-0
2024-03-04vs Westchase Fireballs - P. HayesWon 20
W#1 DoublesKrista Mills / MARY HESTON vs Melissa Bode / Nicole Tamulski6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesKaren Wingard vs Catherine Ansel6-2, 6-3
W#1 DoublesMichelle Mcclendon / Krista Mills vs Patricia Smith / Debra Summers6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesNicole Iacono vs Amy Flaherty6-2, 6-1
L#2 SinglesBecky Kuntz vs Christy Clinard0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRaquel Pullaro / Jackie Botet vs Betty McIntosh / Dianna Lott2-6, 4-6
W#1 DoublesLacy Gregory / Krista Mills vs Risa Blake / Pat Morris6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesNicole Iacono vs Jian Sun6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDanielle Eichmann / Karen Wingard vs Jihea Helme / Lindsay Siegel6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesRaquel Pullaro vs Viktoriya Koverzhenko2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJackie Botet / Becky Kuntz vs Anne McKenna / Hyun Kim1-6, 6-7
2024-02-12vs Grand Hampton - M. QuinonesWon 20
W#1 DoublesLacy Gregory / MARY HESTON vs Fanny Carrizosa / Fabiola Morales6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKristin Nail / Karen Wingard vs Denise Stone / Cynthia Ciarpelli3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-01-29vs D.I. Serve Aces - A. QuinnSplit 22
W#1 DoublesKrista Mills / MARY HESTON vs Carole Jahns / Nicole Borel-Saladin6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMichelle Mcclendon / Nicole Iacono vs Julie Sayer / Amy Quinn2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 SinglesKristin Nail vs Elizabeth Provenzano2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesDanielle Eichmann / Karen Wingard vs Erin Braga / Bridget Pastore3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-01-15vs HCC Smoke Show - E. FlitmanWon 31
W#1 DoublesKrista Mills / MARY HESTON vs Jennifer Duglin / Chet Gowda6-0, 6-2
W#1 SinglesNicole Iacono vs Jennifer Miller7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesLacy Gregory / Karen Wingard vs Anne Marie Lennox / Danielle Goodsell3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMichelle Mcclendon / Kristin Nail vs Emelia Flitman / Robin Perrone7-6, 6-1
2024-01-08vs Cheval Servivors - M. ChevalierWon 20
W#1 DoublesKrista Mills / MARY HESTON vs Anjali Singh / Vera Trayner6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKaren Wingard / Kristin Nail vs Cheryl Bell / Lauren Jennings6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 18 & Over Day- Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
MARY HESTON
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
3.28
Nicole Iacono
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.27
Karen Wingard
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.27
Ashley Gagne
published 3.5
3.25
Lacy Gregory
published
3.21
Krista Mills
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Kristin Nail
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 3.5
2.82
Becky Kuntz
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.77
Jackie Botet
published 3
2.69
Raquel Pullaro
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.51
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Wingard + Kristin Nail24363% games+11.9% vs expected
Raquel Pullaro + Becky Kuntz7753% games+10.5% vs expected
MARY HESTON + Krista Mills7655% games+6.0% vs expected
Krista Mills + Kristin Nail4164% gamesnot enough data
Raquel Pullaro + Kristin Nail303 matchesnot enough data
Krista Mills + Karen Wingard213 matchesnot enough data
Lacy Gregory + Karen Wingard213 matchesnot enough data
Ashley Gagne + Kristin Nail303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
MARY HESTON
124W–51L career · 9 lines in 2024
<1%34%66%
3.55
3.5
Nicole Iacono
44W–47L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Karen Wingard
117W–68L career · 7 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Ashley Gagne
11W–3L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.27
Lacy Gregory
16W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%3%97%
3.25
3.5
Krista Mills
68W–33L career · 7 lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Kristin Nail
80W–31L career · 5 lines in 2024
8%91%1%
3.19
3
Becky Kuntz
53W–62L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Jackie Botet
17W–9L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Raquel Pullaro
72W–68L career · 3 lines in 2024
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Danielle Eichmann
1W–7L career · no lines in 2024
48%52%<1%
2.51

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.