Teams

SLI: The Forever Ins

2026 18&Over Women Day Fall · 3.0 Day

15 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-12-05vs WTC: 3.0 Rye RenegadesSplit 11
W#2 DoublesErendira Matzumura / Chandra Turner vs Kady Keen / Emily Cacciapaglia6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesSarah Kim / Liz Farrell vs Katie Burns / Blair Bruning6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSarah Kim / Doreen Chung-Waldman vs Eileen ORourke / Laura Hupprich6-4, 6-1
2025-11-14vs Sportime HI: Armada UNITEDWon 10
W#2 DoublesChandra Turner / Erendira Matzumura vs Brooke Brandt / Andrea Johnson6-4, 6-1
2025-10-31vs RRC: Love is NothingWon 30
W#1 DoublesChandra Turner / Erendira Matzumura vs Lisa Chang / Sophie Sandford3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesEvgenia Goncharova / Alexandra Dudar vs Jill DiMassimo / Noreen Cadigan7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesNia Breygin / Jennifer Condon vs Ellen Saya / Kristin Bosacco6-2, 6-1
2025-10-17vs Lifetime EmeraldWon 10
W#1 DoublesChandra Turner / Erendira Matzumura vs Julie Goldstein / Sabrina Bunn6-4, 6-2
2025-10-07vs NRRC - NetChicks and ChillWon 10
W#1 DoublesAlexandra Dudar / Erendira Matzumura vs Virginia Watts / Kerry Roberts6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesErendira Matzumura / Nia Breygin vs Ann Katzenstein / Lori Fromm5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2025-09-26vs Yonkers Queens of the CourtWon 10
W#2 DoublesErendira Matzumura / Sarah Kim vs Simone Bindela / Suzanne Page7-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.12
Alexandra Dudar
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.98
Erendira Matzumura
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.94
Chandra Turner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.89
2.86
Nia Breygin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.85
Ingrid Mudge
published
2.83
Evgenia Goncharova
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.81
Jennifer Condon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.81
Heather Hemsley
published 3
2.78
Rachel Tulchin
published
2.67
Sarah Kim
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.63
Sandra Ritossa
published 3
2.60
Liz Farrell
published
Cynthia Brown
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erendira Matzumura + Alexandra Dudar5356% games+4.0% vs expected
Erendira Matzumura + Nia Breygin3253% games+3.1% vs expected
Erendira Matzumura + Chandra Turner5252% games+0.4% vs expected
Sarah Kim + Chandra Turner10749% games−1.1% vs expected
Chandra Turner + Alexandra Dudar1444% games−3.3% vs expected
Evgenia Goncharova + Alexandra Dudar1547% games−4.2% vs expected
Jennifer Condon + Alexandra Dudar3253% games−4.6% vs expected
Liz Farrell + Rachel Tulchin4354% games−6.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Alexandra Dudar
53W–33L career · 3 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.12
3
Erendira Matzumura
64W–40L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
2.98
3
Chandra Turner
64W–74L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%65%35%
2.94
3
Esther Lomas Sampedro
23W–14L career · type S · no lines in 2026
<1%77%22%
2.89
Nia Breygin
33W–21L career · 1 line in 2026
1%84%15%
2.86
Ingrid Mudge
38W–18L career · no lines in 2026
1%86%14%
2.85
Evgenia Goncharova
17W–20L career · 1 line in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
Jennifer Condon
26W–36L career · 1 line in 2026
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Heather Hemsley
20W–30L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.81
Rachel Tulchin
25W–23L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
Sarah Kim
44W–41L career · 3 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
2.67
3
Sandra Ritossa
34W–52L career · no lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
2.63
Liz Farrell
20W–30L career · no lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
2.60
2.5
Cynthia Brown
7W–25L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Doreen Chung-Waldman
10W–17L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.