Teams

NNM 7.0M Felice - SV

2024 USTA Adult 65 & Over League - NNM · 7.0 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NORTHERN NEW MEXICO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-10-31vs NNM 7.0M Tabish - JCLost 02
L#1 DoublesDavid Salazar / Steven Hall vs Mark Martinez / Steve Plimpton2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJeff Stern / Kevin Hanratty vs Terry Cleveland / Kenneth Tabish6-7, 3-6
2024-10-21vs NNM 7.0M Tabish - JCWon 21
L#1 DoublesBrent Espinoza / Ron Owen vs Steve Plimpton / Tomas Ruiz-Fabrega4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJoseph Felice / Steven Hall vs Vincent Langan / Gary Riley6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJeff Stern / Kevin Hanratty vs Kenneth Tabish / Vince Panzarella6-2, 6-3
2024-10-17vs NNM/Gee/65 & Over/7.0MLost 02
L#1 DoublesDavid Salazar / Brent Espinoza vs Greg Smith / Larry Schneider0-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesDwight McNeil / Kevin Hanratty vs Wayne Baker / Leland Byers6-7, 0-6
2024-10-07vs NNM/Gee/65 & Over/7.0MLost 03
L#1 DoublesBrent Espinoza / Ernesto Maestas vs Kirk Rackow / Anthony Carrejo4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDwight McNeil / Jeff Stern vs Kenneth Kuzio / Leland Byers2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSteven Hall / DAVID SANCHEZ vs James Gee / Wayne Baker2-6, 3-6
2024-09-23vs NNM/Gee/65 & Over/7.0MLost 03
L#1 DoublesErnesto Maestas / Kevin Hanratty vs Greg Smith / Anthony Carrejo1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJoseph Felice / Ron Owen vs Larry Schneider / Louis Landon4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDon Johnson / Dwight McNeil vs Mitchell Levick / Kenneth Kuzio2-6, 3-6
2024-09-19vs NNM 7.0M Tabish - JCWon 21
W#1 DoublesBrent Espinoza / David Salazar vs Tomas Ruiz-Fabrega / Steve Plimpton3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDwight McNeil / Ron Owen vs Jack Batson / Terry Cleveland1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDAVID SANCHEZ / Jeff Stern vs David Arntzem / Mark Martinez3-6, 2-6
2024-09-09vs NNM 7.0M Tabish - JCLost 12
L#1 DoublesBrent Espinoza / Kevin Hanratty vs Tomas Ruiz-Fabrega / Steve Plimpton1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesRon Owen / Joseph Felice vs Kenneth Tabish / Terry Cleveland6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJeff Stern / Don Johnson vs John Loges / Mark Martinez3-6, 1-6
2024-09-05vs NNM/Gee/65 & Over/7.0MLost 12
L#1 DoublesDon Johnson / Brent Espinoza vs Greg Smith / Kirk Rackow6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesDwight McNeil / Kevin Hanratty vs James Gee / Mike Murphy2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMichael Sanchez / DAVID SANCHEZ vs Kenneth Kuzio / William Syme7-5, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 7.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NNM/Gee/65 & Over/7.0M7118616199
2NNM 7.0M Tabish - JC35101430222
3NNM 7.0M Felice - SV2681636245

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Joseph Felice
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Brent Espinoza
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Don Johnson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.09
David Salazar
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.97
Dwight McNeil
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
DAVID SANCHEZ
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Ernesto Maestas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jeff Stern
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Kevin Hanratty
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Ron Owen
published
Steven Hall
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Salazar + Brent Espinoza6349% gamesnot enough data
Brent Espinoza + Ernesto Maestas3351% gamesnot enough data
Joseph Felice + Brent Espinoza314 matchesnot enough data
Joseph Felice + David Salazar303 matchesnot enough data
Dwight McNeil + Don Johnson033 matchesnot enough data
David Salazar + Steven Hall123 matchesnot enough data
Ernesto Maestas + Don Johnson033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Joseph Felice
92W–79L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Brent Espinoza
20W–22L career · 6 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
Don Johnson
42W–55L career · 3 lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.17
3.5
David Salazar
34W–57L career · 3 lines in 2024
25%74%<1%
3.09
Dwight McNeil
37W–53L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
DAVID SANCHEZ
54W–53L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Ernesto Maestas
36W–30L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Jeff Stern
4W–11L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Kevin Hanratty
2W–5L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
Ron Owen
42W–27L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Steven Hall
4W–7L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.