Teams

Parvizian-40/3.0/M/StoneCreek

2026 Man · Cov Adult 40 & Over - Men

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings4 teams · Cov Adult 40 & Over - Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Parvizian-40/3.0/M/StoneCreek81251130296
2Miller-40/3.0/M/Francos54211532294
3Walker-40/3.0/M/Pelican36181838322
4Griffin-40/3.0/M/N Cypress2782857364

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.98
Brian Darr
usually #2 Doubles 29%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.95
Charles Monteiro
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 8% · published 3
2.95
Chris Johnston
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.84
BenF Brown
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.74
Carlos Valencia Sr
usually #2 Doubles 65%, also #3 Doubles 18% · published 3
2.73
Allen Amir Parvizian
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
Kirk Michel
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published
Lane Hollister
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Michael Donohue
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published
Nader Shourbaji
usually #1 Doubles 29%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Randy Pausina
usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published
Ray Dussold
usually #3 Doubles 92%, also #1 Doubles 8% · published
William Alls
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #1 Singles 38% · published
William Gillane
usually #1 Doubles 45%, also #2 Doubles 32% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Charles Monteiro + Michael Donohue4156% gamesnot enough data
Charles Monteiro + Kirk Michel314 matchesnot enough data
William Gillane + Chris Johnston224 matchesnot enough data
Charles Monteiro + Chris Johnston123 matchesnot enough data
Randy Pausina + Allen Amir Parvizian213 matchesnot enough data
William Gillane + Allen Amir Parvizian213 matchesnot enough data
William Gillane + BenF Brown213 matchesnot enough data
Chris Johnston + BenF Brown213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Brian Darr
20W–18L career · 16 lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
2.98
3
Charles Monteiro
11W–10L career · 12 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Chris Johnston
17W–11L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
2.95
3
BenF Brown
24W–14L career · 21 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
2.84
3
Carlos Valencia Sr
22W–11L career · 17 lines in 2026
4%92%3%
2.74
3
Allen Amir Parvizian
23W–23L career · 21 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
Kirk Michel
15W–5L career · 14 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lane Hollister
3W–3L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Michael Donohue
15W–8L career · 15 lines in 2026
not enough data
Nader Shourbaji
8W–26L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Randy Pausina
13W–8L career · 14 lines in 2026
not enough data
Ray Dussold
18W–4L career · 12 lines in 2026
not enough data
William Alls
10W–5L career · 8 lines in 2026
not enough data
William Gillane
27W–26L career · 30 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.