Teams

Eifling-Greenville CC

2025 Adult 55 & Over-DLT · Women 3.0

10 players · average NTRP 2.50 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-04-01vs Jarrett/McGee-DCTRCLost 02
L#2 DoublesMcCall Ainsworth / Pamela Eifling vs Heike Wooley / Jane Oliver2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesNadine Hayek / Michelle Gist vs Mary Ayres / Judy Ross4-6, 4-6
2025-03-25vs Jarrett/McGee-DCTRCLost 03
L#1 DoublesLaurie Gillespie / Leslie Hassett vs Dorothy Huoni / Delma Brown1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMary Hobart / Pam Miller vs Judy Ross / Mary Ayres5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSissy Gardner / Dannette Doolittle vs Margaret Dubois / Carol Scott6-7, 2-6
2025-03-25vs Graham-WinonaSplit 11
L#2 DoublesLaurie Gillespie / Leslie Hassett vs MARLEE GOLDEN / Nancy Parkerson0-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMcCall Ainsworth / Pamela Eifling vs Cindy Boone / Becky Flowers6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2025-03-17vs Jarrett/McGee-DCTRCLost 12
L#1 DoublesTina Murphy / Donna Adams vs Delma Brown / Dorothy Huoni2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesPam Miller / McCall Ainsworth vs Carol Scott / Ann McGee2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesNadine Hayek / Dannette Doolittle vs Debbie Boykin / Jane Oliver2-6, 0-6
2025-03-03vs Graham-WinonaLost 03
L#1 DoublesMichelle Gist / Sissy Gardner vs Cindy Boone / Brenda Blaylock1-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesMary Hobart / Donna Adams vs Ginger Perry / Becky Flowers5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesPamela Eifling / Dannette Doolittle vs Hattie Bourne / Cindy Dulin3-6, 5-7
2025-02-25vs Graham-WinonaWon 20
W#2 DoublesMcCall Ainsworth / Donna Adams vs Cindy Boone / Karla Perry6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLaurie Gillespie / Leslie Hassett vs Hattie Bourne / Brenda Blaylock6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.57 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.88
Laurie Gillespie
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
2.72
McCall Ainsworth
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.55
Donna Adams
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.54
Mary Hobart
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.51
Pamela Eifling
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.49
Nadine Hayek
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.30
Dannette Doolittle
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Leslie Hassett
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Michelle Gist
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Sissy Gardner
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pamela Eifling + McCall Ainsworth1531% games−18.8% vs expected
Laurie Gillespie + Leslie Hassett134 matchesnot enough data
Nadine Hayek + Michelle Gist033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laurie Gillespie
9W–13L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
2.88
McCall Ainsworth
10W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
Donna Adams
4W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
2.55
Mary Hobart
2W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
38%61%<1%
2.54
Pamela Eifling
2W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
2.51
Nadine Hayek
2W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
52%48%<1%
2.49
2.5
Dannette Doolittle
0W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%92%8%
2.30
Leslie Hassett
2W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Michelle Gist
0W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sissy Gardner
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.