Teams

OC Tennis Addicts - FVTC - Tommy Sat9

2023 OC Tri-Level Mixed · WE 8.0 - 7.0 - 6.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.75 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-09-09vs OC Team Courage - LPC - Nisha - Sat9Split 11
L#2 DoublesKate Cameron / Trung Nguyen vs Vivian Truong / Danny Nguyen5-7, 5-7
W#3 DoublesSherrie Hadlich / Tommy Le vs Susan Tan / Thomas Medina6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTommy Le / Hatien Nguyen vs Samuel Cardinal / Lana Dalley6-2, 6-4
2023-08-05vs OC Boot Camp - FVTC - TranSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJon Peabody / Hatien Nguyen vs Eugene Nguyen / Kristen Petrovacki7-6, 7-6
L#2 DoublesKate Cameron / Minh Le vs Danny Nguyen / Eunice Han3-6, 5-7
L#1 DoublesJon Peabody / Hatien Nguyen vs Dalton Lee / Kelly Chuang3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesTrung Nguyen / Sherrie Hadlich vs Luis Prieto / Yasuko Seki0-6, 4-3
L#3 DoublesMark Gross / Sherrie Hadlich vs Zeyang Ren / Huanan Sun4-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WE 8.0 - 7.0 - 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Hatien Nguyen
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.82
Alin Curtean
published 4
3.75
Cecilia Hoang
published 4
3.72
Jon Peabody
published
3.62
Kat Thieu
published
3.45
Jolina Cadilli
published
3.42
Kate Cameron
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.33
Michelle Greenhaw
published
3.30
Sherrie Hadlich
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.27
Mark Gross
published
Jack Yen
published 3.5
Mike Cadilli
published
Sally Scott
published
Trang Phan
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Hatien Nguyen
130W–95L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%88%11%
3.84
4
Alin Curtean
23W–8L career · type M · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Cecilia Hoang
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%2%
3.75
Jon Peabody
23W–9L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.72
Kat Thieu
11W–7L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.62
Jolina Cadilli
19W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%65%35%
3.45
3.5
Kate Cameron
109W–72L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
3.42
Michelle Greenhaw
21W–19L career · no lines in 2023
<1%89%10%
3.33
3.5
Sherrie Hadlich
71W–63L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.30
Mark Gross
29W–14L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Jack Yen
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mike Cadilli
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sally Scott
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Trang Phan
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.