Teams

GCC-Steed 40s 2.5W S

2025 Neuse River Singles 18 & over · 2.5 Women 18 & over

7 players · average NTRP 2.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-03-08vs GR-Colie AFD Ladies 18s 2.5W SWon 30
W#1 SinglesMartha Whitesides vs Geneva Colie6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesKellye Roberts vs Crystal Dawson7-5, 6-2
W#3 SinglesRebecca Blount vs Shelly Sutton6-0, 6-1
2025-02-26vs GR-Colie AFD Ladies 18s 2.5W SWon 21
W#1 SinglesCourtney Steed vs Krista Roberson6-2, 6-4
W#2 SinglesRebecca Blount vs Geneva Colie6-0, 6-2
L#3 SinglesDannie Moss vs Crystal Dawson7-6, 1-6, 0-1
2025-02-15vs GR-Colie AFD Ladies 18s 2.5W SWon 30
W#1 SinglesMartha Whitesides vs Krista Roberson6-0, 6-1
W#2 SinglesKellye Roberts vs Stephanie Cain6-0, 6-2
W#3 SinglesShimika Rasha vs Shelly Sutton6-0, 6-0
2025-02-08vs GR-Colie AFD Ladies 18s 2.5W SWon 30
W#1 SinglesMartha Whitesides vs Cathy Williams6-1, 6-3
W#2 SinglesCourtney Steed vs Stephanie Cain6-0, 7-5
W#3 SinglesDannie Moss vs Crystal Dawson4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-02-01vs GR-Colie AFD Ladies 18s 2.5W SWon 30
W#1 SinglesCourtney Steed vs Stephanie Cain6-3, 6-0
W#2 SinglesKellye Roberts vs Krista Roberson6-2, 6-3
W#3 SinglesShimika Rasha vs Shelly Sutton6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women 18 & over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.48 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.98
Martha Whitesides
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.72
Courtney Steed
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3
2.65
Shimika Rasha
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.60
Rebecca Blount
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
2.23
Kellye Roberts
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.17
Dannie Moss
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 2.5
2.00
Mary Jane Thomassen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dannie Moss + Courtney Steed4162% games+18.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Martha Whitesides
29W–10L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
2.98
3
Courtney Steed
23W–10L career · 5 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
Shimika Rasha
26W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%14%86%
2.65
Rebecca Blount
33W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%25%75%
2.60
Kellye Roberts
26W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.23
2.5
Dannie Moss
14W–26L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.17
Mary Jane Thomassen
2W–23L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.00

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.