Teams

CBHS-D'Adamio

2024 · 25 NEGTA USTA Adult 18 & Over - Fall

16 players · average NTRP 3.00 / GEORGIA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2024-11-22Won 50
W#1 DoublesLori D'Adamio / Patsy Greer vs Barb Miller / Amy Lane6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesScottie Rittenberry vs Amanda Smith6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesChris Dalrymple / Karen Tinker vs Angie Sisk / Leisa Smith6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesElaine Schenck / Debbie Underwood vs Barbara Dumont / Theresa Heffernan6-3, 6-2
W#4 DoublesMichelle Ashwood / Patty Bettencourt vs Darcey Latzsch / Kerry Whitlock6-0, 6-0
2024-10-18Won 50
W#1 DoublesScottie Rittenberry / Lori D'Adamio vs Amy Lane / Barb Miller6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesPaula Conner vs Bethany Johnson7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesElaine Schenck / Chris Dalrymple vs Angie Sisk / Leisa Smith6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesTracy Cavaness / Rebecca Neal vs Barbara Dumont / Phyllis Gailey6-1, 6-0
W#4 DoublesKaren Tinker / Michelle Ashwood vs Kathy White / Kerry Whitlock6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 25 NEGTA USTA Adult 18 & Over - Fall have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.14
Patsy Greer
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.05
Patty Bettencourt
usually #4 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.04
Tracy Cavaness
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Chris Dalrymple
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.02
Michelle Ashwood
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
3.01
Lori D'Adamio
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.96
Scottie Rittenberry
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.84
Elaine Schenck
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Angie Hutson
published 3
2.69
Debbie Underwood
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Gail Tucker
published
Martha Friedman
published
Patsy Carey
published
Paula Conner
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Rebecca Neal
published
Sandra Martin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Scottie Rittenberry + Lori D'Adamio6071% games+11.9% vs expected
Michelle Ashwood + Lori D'Adamio8361% games+6.3% vs expected
Chris Dalrymple + Michelle Ashwood4353% games+2.1% vs expected
Chris Dalrymple + Angie Hutson3645% games−2.6% vs expected
Chris Dalrymple + Lori D'Adamio3652% games−4.9% vs expected
Rebecca Neal + Martha Friedman3353% gamesnot enough data
Elaine Schenck + Michelle Ashwood044 matchesnot enough data
Patsy Carey + Gail Tucker044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Patsy Greer
105W–64L career · 3 lines in 2025
15%84%1%
3.14
Patty Bettencourt
46W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%37%63%
3.05
Tracy Cavaness
4W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%38%62%
3.04
3
Chris Dalrymple
44W–40L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.02
Michelle Ashwood
41W–34L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.02
Lori D'Adamio
43W–45L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.01
Scottie Rittenberry
24W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
2.96
Elaine Schenck
23W–48L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%87%13%
2.84
3
Angie Hutson
8W–16L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Debbie Underwood
13W–31L career · 1 line in 2025
8%90%1%
2.69
Gail Tucker
2W–24L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Martha Friedman
6W–19L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Patsy Carey
1W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Paula Conner
11W–30L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Rebecca Neal
12W–33L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sandra Martin
8W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.