Teams

BAY CLUB SANTA CLARA 18AM4.0A

2025 ADULT 18&Over · Men's 4.0

20 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Men's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.06
Grant Wollen
published
4.04
Andre Nodem
published 4
3.98
Joe Liebeschuetz
published 4
3.97
Andrew Irish
published 4
3.96
3.93
Dan Gullion
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.82
Venkat Gajulapalli
published
3.82
Slaven Tezak
published
3.80
Joseph Huang
published
3.79
Ashok Anumandla
published 4
3.77
Piruz Fazeli
published
3.73
Rodney Wade
published
3.71
John Nakamura
published
3.65
UMER KHAN
published
3.63
Joshua Spin
published
3.62
Abhijeet Karnik
published 4
3.55
Hal Kalechofsky
published
3.53
Patrick Hare
published
3.49
Spencer Huang
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.46
Peter Kuo
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dan Gullion + John Nakamura404 matchesnot enough data
Joshua Spin + Andrew Irish224 matchesnot enough data
John Nakamura + Grant Wollen404 matchesnot enough data
Rodney Wade + Ashok Anumandla123 matchesnot enough data
John Nakamura + Ashok Anumandla303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Grant Wollen
14W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%34%66%
4.06
4
Andre Nodem
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%40%60%
4.04
4
Joe Liebeschuetz
96W–64L career · no lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
3.98
4
Andrew Irish
18W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
3.97
4
An-Vincent Nguyen
15W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
3.96
4
Dan Gullion
37W–27L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.93
Venkat Gajulapalli
9W–10L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
Slaven Tezak
7W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
Joseph Huang
30W–8L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.80
4
Ashok Anumandla
19W–11L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
Piruz Fazeli
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
Rodney Wade
29W–22L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
John Nakamura
30W–8L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.71
UMER KHAN
6W–1L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.65
Joshua Spin
6W–8L career · no lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.63
4
Abhijeet Karnik
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
20%79%<1%
3.62
Hal Kalechofsky
5W–14L career · no lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.55
Patrick Hare
6W–9L career · no lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.53
Spencer Huang
8W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
54%46%<1%
3.49
Peter Kuo
13W–12L career · no lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
3.46

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.