Teams

Robinson/Lynch/LR/Reb

2026 Tri-Level 40 & Over · 4.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.25 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-13vs Wayne/Jacksonville/BPWon 21
W#1 DoublesMelaney Gee / Katie Staggs vs Sandra Williams / Chyrel Henry2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKathy Robinson / Elaine Bultena vs Allani Preston / Brooklyn Blackmon2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKimberly Gardner / Leah Hart vs Denise Allen-Duff / Orena McClendon1-6, 1-6
2026-08-10vs Oates/Howse/Rville/CTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesKatie Staggs / Elaine Bultena vs Jessica Underwood / Ellie Karvoski1-6
L#2 DoublesDeanna Garretson / Wendy Lynch vs Jennifer Simmons / Caroline Howse3-6, 5-4
L#3 DoublesVanesa Wood / Kimberly Gardner vs Lori Shepard / Elly Rumbach1-6, 2-6
2026-08-04vs Wayne/Jacksonville/BPLost 12
L#1 DoublesKatie Staggs / Melaney Gee vs Sandra Williams / Chyrel Henry2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesKathy Robinson / Wendy Lynch vs Evelyn Brown / Brooklyn Blackmon6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKimberly Gardner / Vanesa Wood vs Calandra Bucella / Regina Maher3-6, 2-6
2026-07-22vs Junior/LR/OCLost 03
L#1 DoublesKatie Staggs / Wendy Lynch vs Margaret Hicks / Melanie Bobo3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMelaney Gee / Kathy Robinson vs Flora Lucia De La Garza Bayon / Anita Junior3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesVanesa Wood / Leah Hart vs Erin Cosse / Morgan Doughty4-6, 1-6
2026-07-19vs Liaw/Gardner/LR/LRACLost 03
L#1 DoublesLeah Hart / Vanesa Wood vs Holly Caruthers / Robin Swede1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMelaney Gee / Kim Worrell vs Joy Liaw / Joanna Hladun Newkirk6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesElaine Bultena / Katie Staggs vs Victoria Dejoy / Karrie Wroten3-6, 3-6
2026-07-12vs RWayne/Law/LR/PVCCLost 12
W#1 DoublesKatie Staggs / Elaine Bultena vs Molly Telford / Shiloah Kviatkovsky6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesWendy Lynch / Kathy Robinson vs Mary Thalheimer / Christine Castillo3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLeah Hart / Vanesa Wood vs Katie Hicks / Kristin Connell2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Katie Staggs
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.45
Wendy Lynch
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.41
Melaney Gee
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.38
Deanna Garretson
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.36
Elaine Bultena
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.33
Kim Worrell
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.21
Manda Wood
published
2.83
Vanesa Wood
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.81
Jessica Doose
published
2.73
Kimberly Gardner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.59
Camille Davis
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kim Worrell + Melaney Gee3453% games−0.2% vs expected
Katie Staggs + Elaine Bultena123 matchesnot enough data
Katie Staggs + Wendy Lynch123 matchesnot enough data
Katie Staggs + Melaney Gee123 matchesnot enough data
Elaine Bultena + Manda Wood033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katie Staggs
22W–21L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
3.45
Wendy Lynch
17W–22L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
3.45
Melaney Gee
29W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.41
3.5
Deanna Garretson
22W–29L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.38
Elaine Bultena
18W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.36
Kim Worrell
32W–22L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.33
Manda Wood
6W–6L career · no lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.21
Vanesa Wood
8W–22L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
Jessica Doose
23W–27L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.81
Kimberly Gardner
7W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Camille Davis
11W–10L career · no lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
2.59

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.