Teams

Lim - We Live on The Edge

2025 Montgomery Doubles Summer Women · Montgomery Doubles Summer 4.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-08-27vs Yuan - Power SmashWon 20
W#1 DoublesPamela Hjelle / Karyn Ialeggio vs Tina Halley / Mari Collins6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRaina Fishbane / Shannon Hockey vs Ellie Taylor / Meaghan Curry6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2025-08-26vs moorhead - Wonder WomenLost 02
L#1 DoublesPamela Hjelle / Shannon Hockey vs Patricia Block / Kathy Crowley1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKaryn Ialeggio / Julie Doll vs Victoria Copeland / Kristin Odonnell1-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-08-22vs Curran - WGCCSplit 11
L#2 DoublesKaryn Ialeggio / Cheng Hoon Lim vs Gillian Curran / Kathleen Ricchetti4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesPamela Hjelle / Shannon Hockey vs Shannon Haynes / Caroline Mountcastle6-1, 6-4
2025-08-15vs Psacharopoulos - Congressional 4.0Lost 02
L#1 DoublesPamela Hjelle / Elizabeth Rahn vs Lori Clogg / Kerry Minich2-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesPatty Craver / Claire Merril vs Missi Dye / Erika Psacharopoulos3-5
2025-07-31vs horowitz - BCC AcesWon 10
W#2 DoublesShannon Hockey / Raina Fishbane vs Sandy Horowitz / Li Ives7-6, 5-3
2025-07-16vs Psacharopoulos - Congressional 4.0Lost 02
L#1 DoublesPamela Hjelle / Shannon Hockey vs Melanie Caudron / Kimberly Ocampo3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKaryn Ialeggio / Julie Doll vs PAMELA BOLAND / Elizabeth Cormier3-6, 3-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Doubles Summer 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Pamela Hjelle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.47
Cheng Hoon Lim
published 3.5
3.46
Karyn Ialeggio
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.44
Shannon Hockey
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.43
Raina Fishbane
published
3.40
Karen Leder
published
3.32
Claire Merril
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Elizabeth Rahn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Julie Doll
published
Patty Craver
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Randi Tercyak
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Pamela Hjelle
1W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%3%
3.75
3.5
Cheng Hoon Lim
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Karyn Ialeggio
45W–30L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.46
3.5
Shannon Hockey
34W–34L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.44
Raina Fishbane
1W–8L career · no lines in 2025
69%31%<1%
3.43
Karen Leder
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
77%23%<1%
3.40
3.5
Claire Merril
4W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Elizabeth Rahn
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Julie Doll
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Patty Craver
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Randi Tercyak
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.