Teams

Ed.King40C

2023 Cap Combo 40 & Over · 6.5 Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.20 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-09-14vs Gr.Christopher40CLost 01
L#3 DoublesWilliam Santa Rosa / John Rhoades vs David Steele / Kenneth Lesher1-6, 0-6
2023-09-07vs Bi.Green40CWon 20
W#2 DoublesBen Micham / Charles King vs Mike Spinak / AP Blake6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCharles Ashby / Kevin Roddy vs Michael Gee / Michael Campbell6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2023-08-31vs Ga.Fye40CLost 03
L#1 DoublesJeremy Broglin / Ben Micham vs Britton Williams / Matthew Durbin5-7, 6-7
L#2 DoublesMichael Tadych / Charles Ashby vs Harrison Edwards / Glen Steinhardt0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJohn Rhoades / William Santa Rosa vs Anthony Womack / Mike Uhland2-6, 3-6
2023-08-24vs Br.Ross40CLost 01
L#3 DoublesChristopher Carrigan / William Santa Rosa vs Rob Sellick / Ben Williams2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2023-08-17vs Ph.Gugliotta40CLost 01
L#3 DoublesCharles Ashby / Eddie King vs Graham Wright / Ivan Tseng2-6, 0-6
2023-08-10vs Br.McLean40CWon 20
W#1 DoublesTyler Priest / Jeremy Broglin vs Scott Hoffman / Ian Campbell7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCharles King / Ben Micham vs Kevin Hampton / Andrew Collicutt4-6, 6-0, 1-0
2023-08-03vs La.Williams40CWon 10
W#1 DoublesTyler Priest / Jeremy Broglin vs Bobby Hammond / West Ludwig6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Tyler Priest
published
3.28
Robert Caulfield
published
3.11
Ben Micham
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.03
2.96
Charles Ashby
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.83
Mark Gentry
published
2.83
Kevin Roddy
published
2.70
Eddie King
published
2.63
Jeremy Broglin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.46
William Santa Rosa
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.37
Philip Apostolico
published
Marty Kocurek
published
Michael Tadych
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tyler Priest
4W–12L career · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.60
Robert Caulfield
8W–13L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Ben Micham
70W–54L career · 4 lines in 2023
21%78%<1%
3.11
3.5
Christopher Carrigan
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
42%58%<1%
3.03
3.5
Charles Ashby
19W–68L career · 3 lines in 2023
61%39%<1%
2.96
Mark Gentry
11W–16L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
2.83
Kevin Roddy
4W–14L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
2.83
Eddie King
10W–14L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
2.70
3
Jeremy Broglin
62W–86L career · 3 lines in 2023
18%81%<1%
2.63
2.5
William Santa Rosa
34W–81L career · 3 lines in 2023
0%61%39%
2.46
Philip Apostolico
0W–5L career · no lines in 2023
83%17%<1%
2.37
Marty Kocurek
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Michael Tadych
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.